ArticleScientific reports2022
Small intestinal viability assessment using dielectric relaxation spectroscopy and deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic potential of casticin in alleviating ovarian torsion/detorsion-induced ovarian and lung injuries.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2025Article
- Real-Time Monitoring Using Multiplexed Multi-Electrode Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy for the Stratification of Vascularized Composite Allografts: A Perspective on Predictive Analytics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Assessment of Intestinal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Using Diffuse Reflectance VIS-NIR Spectroscopy and Histology.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Utilization of dielectric properties for assessment of liver ischemia-reperfusion injury in vivo and during machine perfusion.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intestinal ischemia is a serious condition where the surgeon often has to make important but difficult decisions regarding resections and resection margins. Previous studies have shown that 3 h (hours) of warm full ischemia of the small bowel followed by reperfusion appears to be the upper limit for viability in the porcine mesenteric ischemia model. However, the critical transition between 3 to 4 h of ischemic injury can be nearly impossible to distinguish intraoperatively based on standard clinical methods. In this study, permittivity data from porcine intestine was used to analyze the characteristics of various degrees of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Our results show that dielectric relaxation spectroscopy can be used to assess intestinal viability. The dielectric constant and conductivity showed clear differences between healthy, ischemic and reperfused intestinal segments. This indicates that dielectric parameters can be used to characterize different intestinal conditions. In addition, machine learning models were employed to classify viable and non-viable segments based on frequency dependent dielectric properties of the intestinal tissue, providing a method for fast and accurate intraoperative surgical decision-making. An average classification accuracy of 98.7% was obtained using only permittivity data measured during ischemia, and 96.2% was obtained with data measured during reperfusion. The proposed approach allows the surgeon to get accurate evaluation from the trained machine learning model by performing one single measurement on an intestinal segment where the viability state is questionable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.