Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35228558›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Development and validation of a population-based risk stratification model for severe COVID-19 in the general population.

Emili Vela, Gerard Carot-Sans, Montse Clèries, David Monterde, Xènia Acebes, Adrià Comella, Luís García Eroles, Marc Coca, Damià Valero-Bover, Pol Pérez Sust and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Risk model derivation and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 pneumonia patients discharged from the emergency department.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emili VelaServei Català de la Salut (CatSalut), Barcelona, Spain.
Gerard Carot-SansServei Català de la Salut (CatSalut), Barcelona, Spain.
Montse ClèriesServei Català de la Salut (CatSalut), Barcelona, Spain.
David MonterdeDigitalization for the Sustainability of the Healthcare System (DS3), IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
Xènia AcebesServei Català de la Salut (CatSalut), Barcelona, Spain.
Adrià ComellaServei Català de la Salut (CatSalut), Barcelona, Spain.
Luís García ErolesServei Català de la Salut (CatSalut), Barcelona, Spain.
Marc CocaServei Català de la Salut (CatSalut), Barcelona, Spain.
Damià Valero-BoverServei Català de la Salut (CatSalut), Barcelona, Spain.
Pol Pérez SustServei Català de la Salut (CatSalut), Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi Piera-JiménezServei Català de la Salut (CatSalut), Barcelona, Spain. jpiera@catsalut.cat.
Servei de Salut de les Illes Balears · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shortage of recently approved vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has highlighted the need for evidence-based tools to prioritize healthcare resources for people at higher risk of severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Although age has been identified as the most important risk factor (particularly for mortality), the contribution of underlying comorbidities is often assessed using a pre-defined list of chronic conditions. Furthermore, the count of individual risk factors has limited applicability to population-based "stratify-and-shield" strategies. We aimed to develop and validate a COVID-19 risk stratification system that allows allocating individuals of the general population into four mutually-exclusive risk categories based on multivariate models for severe COVID-19, a composite of hospital admission, transfer to intensive care unit (ICU), and mortality among the general population. The model was developed using clinical, hospital, and epidemiological data from all individuals among the entire population of Catalonia (North-East Spain; 7.5 million people) who experienced a COVID-19 event (i.e., hospitalization, ICU admission, or death due to COVID-19) between March 1 and September 15, 2020, and validated using an independent dataset of 218,329 individuals with COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), who were infected after developing the model. No exclusion criteria were defined. The final model included age, sex, a summary measure of the comorbidity burden, the socioeconomic status, and the presence of specific diagnoses potentially associated with severe COVID-19. The validation showed high discrimination capacity, with an area under the curve of the receiving operating characteristics of 0.85 (95% CI 0.85-0.85) for hospital admissions, 0.86 (0.86-0.97) for ICU transfers, and 0.96 (0.96-0.96) for deaths. Our results provide clinicians and policymakers with an evidence-based tool for prioritizing COVID-19 healthcare resources in other population groups aside from those with higher exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and frontline workers.

Indexed as

HospitalizationIntensive Care UnitsModels, BiologicalSARS-CoV-2COVID-19FemaleHumansMaleRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexSpain

Identifiers

PMID35228558
PMCPMC8885698
OpenAlexW4214591894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.