Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35228538›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Single-cell gene fusion detection by scFusion.

Zijie Jin, Wenjian Huang, Ning Shen, Juan Li, Xiaochen Wang, Jiqiao Dong, Peter J Park, Ruibin Xi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Oncogenic gene fusions in cancer: from biology to therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. ELLIPSIS: robust quantification of splicing in scRNA-seq.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zijie JinSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Wenjian HuangAcademy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2408-8302
Ning ShenLiangzhu Laboratory, Zhejiang University Medical Center, Hangzhou, 311121, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4709-3374
Juan LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0521-9648
Xiaochen WangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Jiqiao DongGeneX Health Co. Ltd, Beijing, 100195, China.
Peter J ParkDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02115, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9378-960X
Ruibin XiSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China. ruibinxi@math.pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7545-7361
Peking University · CNHarvard University · USAnnoroad Gene Technology (China) · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 11971039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene fusions can play important roles in tumor initiation and progression. While fusion detection so far has been from bulk samples, full-length single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) offers the possibility of detecting gene fusions at the single-cell level. However, scRNA-seq data have a high noise level and contain various technical artifacts that can lead to spurious fusion discoveries. Here, we present a computational tool, scFusion, for gene fusion detection based on scRNA-seq. We evaluate the performance of scFusion using simulated and five real scRNA-seq datasets and find that scFusion can efficiently and sensitively detect fusions with a low false discovery rate. In a T cell dataset, scFusion detects the invariant TCR gene recombinations in mucosal-associated invariant T cells that many methods developed for bulk data fail to detect; in a multiple myeloma dataset, scFusion detects the known recurrent fusion IgH-WHSC1, which is associated with overexpression of the WHSC1 oncogene. Our results demonstrate that scFusion can be used to investigate cellular heterogeneity of gene fusions and their transcriptional impact at the single-cell level.

Indexed as

Gene FusionSingle-Cell AnalysisSequence Analysis, RNASoftware

Identifiers

PMID35228538
PMCPMC8885711
OpenAlexW4214508880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.