Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35228262›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2022

Development and Validation of an Enzyme Immunoassay for Detection and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Salivary IgA and IgG.

Veronica P Costantini, Kenny Nguyen, Zoe Lyski, Shannon Novosad, Ana C Bardossy, Amanda K Lyons, Paige Gable, Preeta K Kutty, Joseph D Lutgring, Amanda Brunton and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biomarkers in oral immunotherapy.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Veronica P CostantiniDivision of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; vcostantini@cdc.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-1532-4345
Kenny NguyenOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN.ORCID 0000-0003-1727-5441
Zoe LyskiDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.ORCID 0000-0003-3631-8072
Shannon NovosadDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Ana C BardossyDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-3523-112X
Amanda K LyonsDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0003-4312-2481
Paige GableDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-3223-7569
Preeta K KuttyDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0001-9813-8048
Joseph D LutgringDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0001-5723-8317
Amanda BruntonDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.ORCID 0000-0003-4061-5870
Natalie J ThornburgDivision of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Allison C BrownDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0003-0011-0309
L Clifford McDonaldDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0003-3044-5572
William MesserDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Jan VinjéDivision of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USOregon Health & Science University · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · US

Funding

Long Term Immunity Following Yellow Fever VaccinationR01AI145835 · NIAID · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MESSER, WILLIAM · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI145835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral fluids offer a noninvasive sampling method for the detection of Abs. Quantification of IgA and IgG Abs in saliva allows studies of the mucosal and systemic immune response after natural infection or vaccination. We developed and validated an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect and quantify salivary IgA and IgG Abs against the prefusion-stabilized form of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein expressed in suspension-adapted HEK-293 cells. Normalization against total Ab isotype was performed to account for specimen differences, such as collection time and sample volume. Saliva samples collected from 187 SARS-CoV-2 confirmed cases enrolled in 2 cohorts and 373 prepandemic saliva samples were tested. The sensitivity of both EIAs was high (IgA, 95.5%; IgG, 89.7%) without compromising specificity (IgA, 99%; IgG, 97%). No cross-reactivity with endemic coronaviruses was observed. The limit of detection for SARS-CoV-2 salivary IgA and IgG assays were 1.98 ng/ml and 0.30 ng/ml, respectively. Salivary IgA and IgG Abs were detected earlier in patients with mild COVID-19 symptoms than in severe cases. However, severe cases showed higher salivary Ab titers than those with a mild infection. Salivary IgA titers quickly decreased after 6 wk in mild cases but remained detectable until at least week 10 in severe cases. Salivary IgG titers remained high for all patients, regardless of disease severity. In conclusion, EIAs for both IgA and IgG had high specificity and sensitivity for the confirmation of current or recent SARS-CoV-2 infections and evaluation of the IgA and IgG immune response.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, ViralAsymptomatic DiseasesChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19Disease ProgressionEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GInfantMaleAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID35228262
PMCPMC8916996
OpenAlexW4220753514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.