ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2022
Proteogenomic Analysis of Breast Cancer Transcriptomic and Proteomic Data, Using De Novo Transcript Assembly: Genome-Wide Identification of Novel Peptides and Clinical Implications.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational identification and characterization of noncoding RNA-encoded peptides: tools, databases, and in silico strategies.Amino acids · 2026Review
- Mechanisms and technologies in cancer epigenetics.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Nutritional Metabolomics in Diet-Breast Cancer Relations: Current Research, Challenges, and Future Directions-A Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Omics-Based Investigations of Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- PepQuery2 democratizes public MS proteomics data for rapid peptide searching.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Multiomics insights on the onset, progression, and metastatic evolution of breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have carried out proteogenomic analysis of the breast cancer transcriptomic and proteomic data, available at The Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium resource, to identify novel peptides arising from alternatively spliced events as well as other noncanonical expressions. We used a pipeline that consisted of de novo transcript assembly, six frame-translated custom database, and a combination of search engines to identify novel peptides. A portfolio of 4,387 novel peptide sequences initially identified was further screened through PepQuery validation tool (Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium), which yielded 1,558 novel peptides. We considered the dataset of 1,558 validated through PepQuery to understand their functional and clinical significance, leaving the rest to be further verified using other validation tools and approaches. The novel peptides mapped to the known gene sequences as well as to genomic regions yet undefined for translation, 580 novel peptides mapped to known protein-coding genes, 147 to non-protein-coding genes, and 831 belonged to novel translational sequences. The novel peptides belonging to protein-coding genes represented alternatively spliced events or 5' or 3' extensions, whereas others represented translation from pseudogenes, long noncoding RNAs, or novel peptides originating from uncharacterized protein-coding sequences-mostly from the intronic regions of known genes. Seventy-six of the 580 protein-coding genes were associated with cancer hallmark genes, which included key oncogenes, transcription factors, kinases, and cell surface receptors. Survival association analysis of the 76 novel peptide sequences revealed 10 of them to be significant, and we present a panel of six novel peptides, whose high expression was found to be strongly associated with poor survival of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-enriched subtype. Our analysis represents a landscape of novel peptides of different types that may be expressed in breast cancer tissues, whereas their presence in full-length functional proteins needs further investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.