Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35227775›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience letters2022

Visuospatial orientation: Differential effects of head and body positions.

Patricia Castro, Shahvaiz Hussain, Omer G Mohamed, Diego Kaski, Qadeer Arshad, Adolfo M Bronstein, Amir Kheradmand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patricia CastroNeurotology Unit, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK; Universidad del Desarrollo, Escuela de Fonoaudiología, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Santiago, Chile; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Centre for Vestibular and Behavioural Neurosciences, University College London, London, UK.
Shahvaiz HussainNeurotology Unit, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Omer G MohamedNeurotology Unit, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Diego KaskiNeurotology Unit, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Centre for Vestibular and Behavioural Neurosciences, University College London, London, UK.
Qadeer ArshadNeurotology Unit, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK; inAmind Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Adolfo M BronsteinNeurotology Unit, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Amir KheradmandDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, USA. Electronic address: http://vorlab.jhu.edu/.

Funding

Elucidating the neural mechanisms of spatial disorientation in vestibular migraineR01DC018815 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KHERADMAND, AMIR · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
TMS of the Supramarginal Gyrus: A WIndow To Spatial OrientationK23DC013552 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KHERADMAND, AMIR · 2014 to 2018
$1.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC013552NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To orientate in space, the brain must integrate sensory information that encodes the position of the body with the visual cues from the surrounding environment. In this process, the extent of reliance on visual information is known as the visual dependence. Here, we asked whether the relative positions of the head and body can modulate such visual dependence (VD). We used the effect of optokinetic stimulation (30°/s) on subjective visual vertical (SVV) to quantify VD as the average optokinetic-induced SVV bias in clockwise and counter-clockwise directions. The VD bias was measured in eight subjects with a head-on-body tilt (HBT) where only the head was tilted on the body, and also with a whole-body tilt (WBT) where the head and body were tilted together. The VD bias with HBT of 20° was in the same direction of the head tilt position (left tilt VD -1.35 ± 0.1.2°; right VD 1.60 ± 0.9°), whereas the VD bias with WBT of 20° was in a direction away from the body tilt position (left tilt VD 2.5 ± 1.1°; right tilt VD -2.1 ± 0.9°). These findings show differential effects of relative head and body positions on visual cue integration, a process which could facilitate optimal interaction with the surrounding environment for spatial orientation.

Indexed as

Head MovementsOrientationHumansPostureSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionHead tiltSensory integrationSpatial orientationSVVVisual dependenceVisuospatial

Identifiers

PMID35227775
PMCPMC8930610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.