In vivo neurophysiological assessment of in silico predictions of neurotoxicity: Citronellal, 3,4-dichloro-1-butene, and benzyl bromoacetate.

Neurotoxicants may be widespread in the environment and can produce serious health impacts in the human population. Screening programs that use in vitro methods have generated data for thousands of chemicals. However, these methods often do not evaluate repeated or prolonged exposures, which are required for many neurotoxic outcomes. Additionally, the data produced by such screening methods may not include mechanisms which play critical biological roles necessary for in vivo neurotoxicity. The Hard and Soft Acids and Bases (HSAB) in silico model focuses on chemical structure and electrophilic properties which are important to the formation of protein adducts. A group of structurally diverse chemicals have been evaluated with an in silico screening approach incorporating HSAB parameters. However, the predictions from the expanded chemical space have not been evaluated using in vivo methods. Three chemicals predicted to be cumulative toxicants were selected for in vivo neurotoxicological testing. Adult male Long-Evans rats were treated orally with citronellal (CIT), 3,4-dichloro-1-butene (DCB), or benzyl bromoacetate (BBA) for 8 weeks. Behavioral observations were recorded weekly to assess motor function. Peripheral neurophysiological measurements were derived from nerve excitability (NE) tests which involved compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) in the tail and foot, and mixed nerve action potentials (MNAPs) in the tail. Compound nerve action potentials (CNAPs) and nerve conduction velocity (NCV) in the tail were also quantified. Peripheral inputs into the central nervous system were examined using somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the cortex (SEP