Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35227670›Full record

ReviewClinical biochemistry2022

Applications of machine learning in routine laboratory medicine: Current state and future directions.

Naveed Rabbani, Grace Y E Kim, Carlos J Suarez, Jonathan H Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical biochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Naveed RabbaniDepartment of Clinical Informatics, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: nrabbani@stanford.edu.
Grace Y E KimDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Carlos J SuarezDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jonathan H ChenStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Division of Hospital Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Stanford Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterAdmin Supp: Developing iPSC models for AD and PDP30AG066515 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer Kaci Fairchild · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
Stanford Medicine Center for Longevity and Healthy Aging Research Education CoreP30AG059307 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ZOU, JAMES · 2018 to 2025
$4.9M
Measuring and Predicting Appropriate Antibiotic Use to Combat Resistant BacteriaR01AI178121 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JONATHAN H. CHEN · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
Machine Learning Clinical Order Recommendations for Specialty Consultation CareR56LM013365 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, JONATHAN H. · 2020 to 2020
$394k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI178121NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059307NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066515NLM NIH HHS R56 LM013365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning is able to leverage large amounts of data to infer complex patterns that are otherwise beyond the capabilities of rule-based systems and human experts. Its application to laboratory medicine is particularly exciting, as laboratory testing provides much of the foundation for clinical decision making. In this article, we provide a brief introduction to machine learning for the medical professional in addition to a comprehensive literature review outlining the current state of machine learning as it has been applied to routine laboratory medicine. Although still in its early stages, machine learning has been used to automate laboratory tasks, optimize utilization, and provide personalized reference ranges and test interpretation. The published literature leads us to believe that machine learning will be an area of increasing importance for the laboratory practitioner. We envision the laboratory of the future will utilize these methods to make significant improvements in efficiency and diagnostic precision.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningForecastingHumansLaboratoriesPrecision MedicineArtificial intelligenceBiochemistryClinical decision supportClinical pathologyPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID35227670
PMCPMC9007900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.