ArticlePrimary care diabetes2022
SEE-Diabetes, a patient-centered diabetes self-management education and support for older adults: Findings and information needs from patients' perspectives.
Article in Primary care diabetes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05958602 (Improving Recruitment and Retention for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support by Bridging Clinical-Community Linkages and Supplemental Diabetes Education Technology), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Recruitment and Retention for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support by Bridging Clinical-Community Linkages and Supplemental Diabetes Education Technology: A Socio-Ecological Approach
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Content Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Diabetes Self-Management Support Tool for Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Study.JMIR diabetes · 2026Article
- Developing and Evaluating SEE-Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Educational Decision Support System for Diabetes Care.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Diabetes self-management education (DSME) for older persons in Western countries: A scoping review.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis study identified the information needs of people with diabetes aged 65 and older through surveys and focus groups to inform the development of a patient-centered educational decision aid for diabetes care, SEE-Diabetes (Support-Engage-Empower-Diabetes).
methodsWe conducted survey (N = 37) and three focus groups (N = 9). The survey collected demographics, diabetes duration, insulin usage, and clinic notes accessibility through a patient portal. In focus groups, participants evaluated the Assessment and Plan section of three selected deidentified clinic notes to assess readability and helpfulness for diabetes care.
resultsThe mean age of participants was 66 (24-82, SD = 12), and 22 were female (60%). The mean diabetes duration was 20.9 years (1-63, SD=15). Most participants (80%) read their clinical notes via patient portal. In the focus groups, the readability of clinic notes was noted as a primary concern because of medical abbreviations and poor formatting. Participants found the helpfulness of clinic notes was negatively impacted by vague or insufficient self-care information.
conclusionsWe found the high use of patient portal for reading clinic notes, which offers a use case opportunity for the proposed SEE-Diabetes educational aid. Feedback about the readability and helpfulness of clinic notes will be considered during the design process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.