ArticleJournal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy2022
Can naive Bayes classifier predict infection in a close contact of COVID-19? A comparative test for predictability of the predictive model and healthcare workers in Japan.
Article in Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infection rate and factors affecting close contacts of COVID-19 cases: A systematic review.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Risk assessment of infection of COVID-19 contacts based on scenario simulation.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
- Aerobic Fitness as an Important Moderator Risk Factor for Loneliness in Physically Trained Older People: An Explanatory Case Study Using Machine Learning.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThose who are found in close contact with COVID-19 patients and are also negative by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test may act without waiting for the incubation period to elapse, can become infectious and spread the infection.
methodsA machine learning model that can evaluate the risk of infection in close contact with COVID-19 patients within the incubation period from the contact status reported from the index case was created using posterior probabilities. To confirm actual predictability, a verification test was conducted on 169 new close contacts, and the machine learning model was compared with four experienced healthcare workers for the predictability.
resultsIn a verification test, 33 of the 169 contacts were infected with COVID-19 during the incubation period, and 13 of 33 were negative on initial PCR test, after that the disease developed and their PCR test became positive. The machine learning model predicted the eventual infection in 12 of 13 patients who had negative results on the initial PCR test. In the verification test, the sensitivity of the machine learning model was 0.879 and the specificity was 0.588. The mean-standard deviation of the sensitivity and the specificity of the four health care workers was 0.568 (0.230) for sensitivity and 0.689 (0.103) for specificity.
conclusionIf it is possible to convey that individual risk of infection, the close contact may take suppressive action during the incubation period regardless of the result of the initial PCR test, thereby preventing secondary spread of infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.