Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35227410›Full record

ArticleBehavior therapy2022

Engagement With Personalized Feedback for Emotional Distress Among College Students at Elevated Suicide Risk.

Adam G Horwitz, Victor Hong, Daniel Eisenberg, Kai Zheng, Ronald Albucher, William Coryell, Jacqueline Pistorello, Todd Favorite, Cheryl A King

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Adam G HorwitzUniversity of Michigan Medical School. Electronic address: ahor@umich.edu.
Victor HongUniversity of Michigan Medical School.
Daniel EisenbergUniversity of California, Los Angeles, School of Public Health.
Kai ZhengUniversity of California, Irvine.
Ronald AlbucherStanford University.
William CoryellUniversity of Iowa.
Jacqueline PistorelloUniversity of Nevada, Reno.
Todd FavoriteUniversity of Michigan Medical School.
Cheryl A KingUniversity of Michigan Medical School.
University of Michigan · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002241 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ELLINGROD, VICKI L · 2017 to 2021
$6.9M
Electronic Bridge to Mental Health (eBridge) for College StudentsR01MH103244 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KING, CHERYL A. · 2014 to 2018
$3.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002241NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression and suicidal ideation have substantially increased among college students, yet many students with clinically significant symptoms do not perceive their distress as warranting mental health services. Personalized feedback (PF) interventions deliver objective data, often electronically, comparing an individual's reported symptoms or behaviors to a group norm. Several studies have shown promise for PF interventions in the context of mood and depression, yet little is known regarding how, and for whom, mood-focused PF interventions might be best deployed. The primary aim of this study was to examine the sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment-seeking factors associated with reviewing PF reports on emotional distress among college students (N = 1,673) screening positive for elevated suicide risk and not receiving mental health treatment. Results indicated that PF engagement was greatest among those with higher depression scores, and those reporting privacy/stigma concerns as barriers to treatment. Sexual minority students were more likely to review their PF than heterosexual students. Taken together, PF interventions may be a useful tool for engaging those with greater clinical acuity, and those hesitant to seek in-person care. Further research is warranted to examine the circumstances in which PF interventions might be used in isolation, or as part of a multitiered intervention strategy.

Indexed as

Psychological DistressSuicideSuicide PreventionEmotionsFeedbackHumansStudentsSuicidal IdeationUniversitiescollege studentsdepressioninterventionpersonalized feedbacksuicide

Identifiers

PMID35227410
PMCPMC8894794
OpenAlexW4229055339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.