Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35227313›Full record

ArticleClinical hypertension2022

Effect of a fixed-dose combination of Telmisartan/S-amlodipine on circadian blood pressure compared with Telmisartan monotherapy: TENUVA-BP study.

Bong-Joon Kim, Kyoung-Im Cho, Hyuck Moon Kwon, Seung-Min Choi, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Sang Wook Lim, Seung-Jae Joo, Nam Ho Lee, Sang-Yup Lim, Seong-Hoon Lim and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical hypertension, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02231788 (A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Phase 4 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Telmisartan/S-Amlodipine), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02231788 phase4completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Phase 4 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Telmisartan/S-Amlodipine(Telminuvo® Tab. 40/2.5mg) on 24-hour Ambulatory BP Control Compared With Telmisartan Monotherapy in Hypertensive Patients Inadequately Controlled by Telmisartan Monotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorChong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalRan2014 to 2018Enrolled217ConditionsHypertensionArmsTelminuvo®Tab. 40/2.5mg, Telmitrend®Tab. 80mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bong-Joon KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Gospel Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5435-7449
Kyoung-Im ChoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Gospel Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3137-0218
Hyuck Moon KwonCardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9901-5015
Seung-Min ChoiDepartment of Cardiology, National Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3997-186X
Chang-Hwan YoonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-4442
Sang Wook LimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6916-4087
Seung-Jae JooDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4322-0703
Nam Ho LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8319-0185
Sang-Yup LimDepartment of Cardiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3042-6702
Seong-Hoon LimCardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2941-2784
Hyo-Soo KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. usahyosoo@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0847-5329
Kosin University Gospel Hospital · KRKorea University · KRSeoul National University · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated the circadian efficacy of a telmisartan 40 mg/S-amlodipine 2.5 mg fixed-dose combination (Telmisartan40/S-Amlodipine2.5) compared to telmisartan 80 mg (Telmisartan80) in patients with essential hypertension who did not respond to 2-4 weeks' treatment with telmisartan 40 mg.

methodsEligible patients with essential hypertension (clinic mean sitting systolic blood pressure [MSSBP] ≥140 mmHg, or ≥ 130 mmHg in those with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease) were randomly assigned to Telmisartan40/S-Amlodipine2.5 or Telmisartan80 for 8 weeks. All patients underwent ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) at baseline and 8 weeks later. Primary endpoints were changes in mean 24-h SBP and DBP on 24-h ABPM from baseline after 8 weeks. Secondary endpoints were changes in daytime, nighttime, and morning SBP and DBP, and clinic MSSBP and MSDBP.

resultsA total of 316 Korean patients were enrolled, 217 patients were randomized to treatment, and 192 patients completed the study. Compared to Telmisartan80, Telmisartan40/S-Amlodipine2.5 showed significantly better reductions in 24-h mean SBP and DBP after 8 weeks. Telmisartan40/S-Amlodipine2.5 also significantly reduced secondary endpoints compared to Telmisartan80. Among 15 adverse events (7 [Telmisartan40/S-Amlodipine2.5] and 8 [Telmisartan80]), there were five adverse drug reactions; 14 events were mild, and none were identified with significant between-group differences.

conclusionsTelmisartan40/S-Amlodipine2.5 was tolerable and more effective than Telmisartan80 in lowering 24-h mean ambulatory BP in patients with essential hypertension not responding adequately to Telmisartan40. Our findings support the fact that the combination of S-amlodipine with telmisartan is more appropriate than increasing the dose of telmisartan monotherapy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02231788 . Registered 4 September 2014.

Indexed as

AmlodipineCircadian rhythmDrug combinationsEssential hypertensionTelmisartan

Identifiers

PMID35227313
PMCPMC8886760
OpenAlexW4214575965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.