Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35227270›Full record

ReviewReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2022

The impact of endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a review.

Jacqueline C Lee, Martina L Badell, Jennifer F Kawwass

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05716139 (Preeclampsia Following Natural vs. Artificial Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05716139 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Preeclampsia Following Natural vs. Artificial Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndira IVF Hospital Pvt LtdRan2023 to 2024Enrolled172ConditionsInfertility, Frozen Embryo Transfer, Preeclampsia and EclampsiaArmsNatural Cycle, Artificial Cycle
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Factors influencing the birth weight of ART-conceived offspring.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacqueline C LeeDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Reproductive Center, 550 Peachtree Street, 18th Floor, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA. Jacqueline.christine.lee@emory.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2493-142X
Martina L BadellDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Perinatal Center, 550 Peachtree Street, 15th floor, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA.
Jennifer F KawwassDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Reproductive Center, 550 Peachtree Street, 18th Floor, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA.
Emory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of frozen embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology (ART) has steadily increased since development in the early 1980's. While there are many benefits to delayed frozen embryo transfer, certain adverse perinatal outcomes are noted to be more common in these transfers when compared to fresh transfers, specifically hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Frozen embryo transfers require coordination between the embryo's developmental stage and the endometrial environment and can occur in either ovulatory or programmed cycles. Though there is no consensus on the ideal method of endometrial preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer, emerging data suggests differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes, specifically increased rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in programmed cycles. Other reported differences include an increased risk of cesarean delivery, placenta accreta, postpartum hemorrhage, low birthweight, preterm birth, post term delivery, macrosomia, large for gestational age, and premature rupture of membranes in programmed cycles. The mechanism by which these differences exist could reflect inherent differences in groups selected for each type of endometrial preparation, the role of super physiologic hormone environments in programmed cycles, or the unique contributions of the corpus luteum in ovulatory cycles that are not present in programmed cycles. Given that existing studies are largely retrospective and have several key limitations, further investigation is needed. Confirmation of these findings has implications for current practice patterns and could enhance understanding of the mechanisms behind important adverse perinatal outcomes in those pursuing assisted reproduction.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeEmbryo TransferEndometriumFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfertilityPregnancyReproductive Techniques, Assistedcorpus luteumEndometrial preparationFrozen-thawed embryo transferHypertensive disorders of pregnancyMaternal outcomeNatural cycleNeonatal outcome

Identifiers

PMID35227270
PMCPMC8883648
OpenAlexW4214647673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.