Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35227265›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Demographic and psychological predictors of community pharmacists' cancer-related conversations with patients: a cross-sectional analysis and survey study.

Robert S Kerrison, Anna Robinson, Hanna Skrobanski, Ghalia Kayal, Aradhna Kaushal, Charlotte Ide-Walters, Adam Todd, Andrew Husband, Shivali Lakhani, Marsha Alter and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early cancer diagnosis and community pharmacies: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robert S KerrisonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK. R.Kerrison@Surrey.ac.uk.
Anna RobinsonSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Hanna SkrobanskiSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK.
Ghalia KayalDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Aradhna KaushalDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Charlotte Ide-WaltersCancer Intelligence Team, Cancer Research UK, London, UK.
Adam ToddSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Andrew HusbandSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Shivali LakhaniMiddlesex Group of Local Pharmaceutical Committees, London, UK.
Marsha AlterMiddlesex Group of Local Pharmaceutical Committees, London, UK.
Christian von WagnerDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Lindsay MacDonaldCancer Intelligence Team, Cancer Research UK, London, UK.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity College London · GBCancer Research UK · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C68512/A28209Cancer Research UK NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing interest in the role of community pharmacy in the early diagnosis and prevention of cancer. This study set out to examine how often community pharmacists (CPs) encourage patients to spot or respond to potential signs and symptoms of cancer, and how often they help people to make an informed decision about taking part in bowel cancer screening.

methodsData from 400 UK CPs, who completed the 2018 Cancer Research UK Healthcare Professional Tracker survey, were analysed. The primary outcomes were: 'how often CPs encourage patients to spot or respond to potential signs and symptoms of cancer' and 'how often CPs encourage eligible people to make an informed decision to participate in bowel cancer screening'. Associations between behaviours and demographic and psychological variables (Capability, Opportunity and Motivation) were assessed using multivariate logistic regression.

resultsMost (n = 331, 82.8%) CPs reported occasionally, frequently or always encouraging patients to spot or respond to potential signs and symptoms of cancer, while only half (n = 203, 50.8%) reported occasionally, frequently or always helping people make an informed decision to participate in bowel cancer screening. Female sex (aOR: 3.20, 95%CI: 1.51, 6.81; p < 0.01) and increased Opportunity (aOR: 1.72, 95%CIs: 1.12, 2.64; p < 0.05) and Motivation (aOR: 1.76, 95%CIs: 1.37, 2.27; p < 0.001) were associated with encouraging patients to spot or respond to potential signs and symptoms of cancer; all three psychological variables were associated with helping people to make an informed decision to participate in bowel cancer screening (Capability: aOR: 1.39, 95%CIs: 1.26, 1.52, p < 0.001; Opportunity: aOR: 1.44, 95%CIs: 1.11, 1.87; p < 0.01; Motivation: aOR: 1.45, 95%CIs: 1.05, 2.00; p < 0.05).

conclusionsMost CPs encourage patients to spot or respond to potential cancer symptoms, while only half help them make an informed decision to participate in bowel cancer screening. A multifaceted approach, targeting multiple COM-B components, is required to change these behaviours.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesNeoplasmsAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyFemaleHumansPharmacistsBowel CancerCancerCommunity PharmacyEarly DiagnosisPreventionScreening

Identifiers

PMID35227265
PMCPMC8883634
OpenAlexW4214631556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.