ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022
Preconception and early-pregnancy risk prediction for birth complications: development of prediction models within a population-based prospective cohort.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paternal preconception modifiable risk factors for adverse pregnancy and offspring outcomes: a review of contemporary evidence from observational studies.BMC public health · 2023Pooled it
- "Actionable" risk for preterm birth: patterns and prediction in California singleton births 2016-2020.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Machine learning to improve the prediction of Large for Gestational Age (LGA) neonates: a cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Agreement between heuristic shrinkage factor and optimal shrinkage factors in logistic regression for risk prediction: a simulation study across different sample sizes and settings.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2026Article
- A study protocol for a predictive model to assess population‑based risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: The Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Population Risk Tool (PregPoRT).Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2026Review
- Maternal Metabolic Health and Mother and Baby Health Outcomes (MAMBO): Protocol of a Prospective Observational Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Prediction of Preterm Birth among Infants with Orofacial Cleft Defects.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuboptimal maternal health already from preconception onwards is strongly linked to an increased risk of birth complications. To enable identification of women at risk of birth complications, we aimed to develop a prediction model for birth complications using maternal preconception socio-demographic, lifestyle, medical history and early-pregnancy clinical characteristics in a general population.
methodsIn a population-based prospective cohort study among 8340 women, we obtained information on 33 maternal characteristics at study enrolment in early-pregnancy. These characteristics covered the preconception period and first half of pregnancy (< 21 weeks gestation). Preterm birth was < 37 weeks gestation. Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) at birth were gestational-age-adjusted birthweight in the lowest or highest decile, respectively. Because of their co-occurrence, preterm birth and SGA were combined into a composite outcome.
resultsThe basic preconception model included easy obtainable maternal characteristics in the preconception period including age, ethnicity, parity, body mass index and smoking. This basic preconception model had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.63 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61 to 0.65) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.66) for preterm birth/SGA and LGA, respectively. Further extension to more complex models by adding maternal socio-demographic, lifestyle, medical history and early-pregnancy clinical characteristics led to small, statistically significant improved models. The full model for prediction of preterm birth/SGA had an AUC 0.66 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.67) with a sensitivity of 22% at a 90% specificity. The full model for prediction of LGA had an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.69) with sensitivity of 28% at a 90% specificity. The developed models had a reasonable level of calibration within highly different socio-economic subsets of our population and predictive performance for various secondary maternal, delivery and neonatal complications was better than for primary outcomes.
conclusionsPrediction of birth complications is limited when using maternal preconception and early-pregnancy characteristics, which can easily be obtained in clinical practice. Further improvement of the developed models and subsequent external validation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.