Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35226964›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia2022

Patient outcomes following transfer between intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic.

F Huq, E Manners, D O'Callaghan, L Thakuria, C Weaver, U Waheed, R Stümpfle, S J Brett, P Patel, S Soni

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Hospital Capacity Pooling in Pandemics: Simulation-Based Mortality Impacts and Diversification Mechanisms.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Critical care and pandemic preparedness and response.British journal of anaesthesia · 2023
    Review
  10. Corrigendum.Anaesthesia · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F HuqDepartment of Critical Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
E MannersDepartment of Critical Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
D O'CallaghanDepartment of Critical Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
L ThakuriaDepartment of Critical Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
C WeaverDepartment of Critical Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
U WaheedDepartment of Critical Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
R StümpfleDepartment of Critical Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
S J BrettDepartment of Critical Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4545-8413
P PatelDepartment of Critical Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
S SoniDepartment of Critical Care, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8126-8313
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GB

Funding

British Journal of Anaesthesia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transferring critically ill patients between intensive care units (ICU) is often required in the UK, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is a paucity of data examining clinical outcomes following transfer of patients with COVID-19 and whether this strategy affects their acute physiology or outcome. We investigated all transfers of critically ill patients with COVID-19 between three different hospital ICUs, between March 2020 and March 2021. We focused on inter-hospital ICU transfers (those patients transferred between ICUs from different hospitals) and compared this cohort with intra-hospital ICU transfers (patients moved between different ICUs within the same hospital). A total of 507 transfers were assessed, of which 137 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-five patients underwent inter-hospital transfers compared with 92 intra-hospital transfers. There was no significant change in median compliance 6 h pre-transfer, immediately post-transfer and 24 h post-transfer in patients who underwent either intra-hospital or inter-hospital transfers. For inter-hospital transfers, there was an initial drop in median PaO

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsPandemicsPatient TransferRetrospective StudiesCOVID-19critical illnessICU to ICU transfer

Identifiers

PMID35226964
PMCPMC9111416
OpenAlexW4214738422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.