Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35226740›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2022

Airborne Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Hospitals: Effects of Aerosol-Generating Procedures, HEPA-Filtration Units, Patient Viral Load, and Physical Distance.

Sara Thuresson, Carl Johan Fraenkel, Sviataslau Sasinovich, Jonathan Soldemyr, Anders Widell, Patrik Medstrand, Malin Alsved, Jakob Löndahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a systematic review on environmental control measures.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Abrupt decreases in infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosols.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara ThuressonDivision of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8243-3632
Carl Johan FraenkelDepartment of Infection Control, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3086-5553
Sviataslau SasinovichDepartment of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3985-8181
Jonathan SoldemyrDivision of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anders WidellDepartment of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Patrik MedstrandDepartment of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4259-8744
Malin AlsvedDivision of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8407-8758
Jakob LöndahlDivision of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9379-592X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can occur through inhalation of fine droplets or aerosols containing infectious virus. The objective of this study was to identify situations, patient characteristics, environmental parameters, and aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) associated with airborne severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus.

methodsAir samples were collected near hospitalized COVID-19 patients and analyzed by RT-qPCR. Results were related to distance to the patient, most recent patient diagnostic PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value, room ventilation, and ongoing potential AGPs.

resultsIn total, 310 air samples were collected; of these, 26 (8%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of the 231 samples from patient rooms, 22 (10%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Positive air samples were associated with a low patient Ct value (OR, 5.0 for Ct <25 vs >25; P = .01; 95% CI: 1.18-29.5) and a shorter physical distance to the patient (OR, 2.0 for every meter closer to the patient; P = .05; 95% CI: 1.0-3.8). A mobile HEPA-filtration unit in the room decreased the proportion of positive samples (OR, .3; P = .02; 95% CI: .12-.98). No association was observed between SARS-CoV-2-positive air samples and mechanical ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula, nebulizer treatment, or noninvasive ventilation. An association was found with positive expiratory pressure training (P < .01) and a trend towards an association for airway manipulation, including bronchoscopies and in- and extubations.

conclusionsOur results show that major risk factors for airborne SARS-CoV-2 include short physical distance, high patient viral load, and poor room ventilation. AGPs, as traditionally defined, seem to be of secondary importance.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HospitalsHumansPhysical DistancingRespiratory Aerosols and DropletsViral Loadaerosol-generating proceduresinfection controlinhalation exposurevirus transmission

Identifiers

PMID35226740
PMCPMC9383519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.