Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35226704›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Machine learning predicts cancer subtypes and progression from blood immune signatures.

David A Simon Davis, Sahngeun Mun, Julianne M Smith, Dillon Hammill, Jessica Garrett, Katharine Gosling, Jason Price, Hany Elsaleh, Farhan M Syed, Ines I Atmosukarto and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David A Simon DavisIrradiation Immunity Interaction Lab, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Sahngeun MunIrradiation Immunity Interaction Lab, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Julianne M SmithIrradiation Immunity Interaction Lab, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Dillon HammillDivision of Genome Sciences & Cancer, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Jessica GarrettDivision of Genome Sciences & Cancer, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Katharine GoslingDivision of Genome Sciences & Cancer, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Jason PriceDivision of Genome Sciences & Cancer, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Hany ElsalehRadiation Oncology Department, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2083-4961
Farhan M SyedIrradiation Immunity Interaction Lab, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Ines I AtmosukartoIrradiation Immunity Interaction Lab, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Benjamin J C QuahIrradiation Immunity Interaction Lab, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2938-5007
Australian National University · AUCanberra Hospital · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer management has highlighted the interconnection between carcinogenesis and the immune system. Immune cells are integral to the tumour microenvironment and can influence the outcome of therapies. Better understanding of an individual's immune landscape may play an important role in treatment personalisation. Peripheral blood is a readily accessible source of information to study an individual's immune landscape compared to more complex and invasive tumour bioipsies, and may hold immense diagnostic and prognostic potential. Identifying the critical components of these immune signatures in peripheral blood presents an attractive alternative to tumour biopsy-based immune phenotyping strategies. We used two syngeneic solid tumour models, a 4T1 breast cancer model and a CT26 colorectal cancer model, in a longitudinal study of the peripheral blood immune landscape. Our strategy combined two highly accessible approaches, blood leukocyte immune phenotyping and plasma soluble immune factor characterisation, to identify distinguishing immune signatures of the CT26 and 4T1 tumour models using machine learning. Myeloid cells, specifically neutrophils and PD-L1-expressing myeloid cells, were found to correlate with tumour size in both the models. Elevated levels of G-CSF, IL-6 and CXCL13, and B cell counts were associated with 4T1 growth, whereas CCL17, CXCL10, total myeloid cells, CCL2, IL-10, CXCL1, and Ly6Cintermediate monocytes were associated with CT26 tumour development. Peripheral blood appears to be an accessible means to interrogate tumour-dependent changes to the host immune landscape, and to identify blood immune phenotypes for future treatment stratification.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAnimalsB7-H1 AntigenCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMyeloid CellsTumor MicroenvironmentB7-H1 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID35226704
PMCPMC8884497
OpenAlexW4214708122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.