Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35226681›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Alternative pre-analytic sample handling techniques for glucose measurement in the absence of fluoride tubes in low resource settings.

Wisdom P Nakanga, Priscilla Balungi, Anxious J Niwaha, Beverly M Shields, Peter Hughes, Rob C Andrews, Tim J Mc Donald, Moffat J Nyirenda, Andrew T Hattersley

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wisdom P NakangaNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Exeter Clinical Research Facility, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8383-0178
Priscilla BalungiNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Exeter Clinical Research Facility, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Anxious J NiwahaNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Exeter Clinical Research Facility, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Beverly M ShieldsNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Exeter Clinical Research Facility, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Peter HughesMedical Research Council/ Uganda Virus and Research Institute and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Rob C AndrewsNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Exeter Clinical Research Facility, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Tim J Mc DonaldMedical Research Council/ Uganda Virus and Research Institute and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Moffat J NyirendaMedical Research Council/ Uganda Virus and Research Institute and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Andrew T HattersleyNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Exeter Clinical Research Facility, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
University of Exeter · GBUganda Virus Research Institute · UGLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSodium fluoride (NaF) tubes are the recommended tubes for glucose measurements, but these are expensive, have limited number of uses, and are not always available in low resource settings. Alternative sample handling techniques are thus needed. We compared glucose stability in samples collected in various tubes exposed to different pre-analytical conditions in Uganda.

methodsRandom (non-fasted) blood samples were drawn from nine healthy participants into NaF, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and plain serum tubes. The samples were kept un-centrifuged or centrifuged with plasma or serum pipetted into aliquots, placed in cool box with ice or at room temperature and were stored in a permanent freezer after 0, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours post blood draw before glucose analysis.

resultsRapid decline in glucose concentrations was observed when compared to baseline in serum (declined to 64%) and EDTA-plasma (declined to 77%) after 6 hours when samples were un-centrifuged at room temperature whilst NaF-plasma was stable after 24 hours in the same condition. Un-centrifuged EDTA-plasma kept on ice was stable for up to 6 hours but serum was not stable (degraded to 92%) in the same conditions. Early centrifugation prevented glucose decline even at room temperature regardless of the primary tube used with serum, EDTA-plasma and NaF-plasma after 24 hours.

conclusionIn low resource settings we recommend use of EDTA tubes placed in cool box with ice and analysed within 6 hours as an alternative to NaF tubes. Alternatively, immediate separation of blood with manual hand centrifuges will allow any tube to be used even in remote settings with no electricity.

Indexed as

Blood Specimen CollectionAdultBlood GlucoseEdetic AcidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSodium FluorideBlood GlucoseEdetic AcidSodium Fluoride

Identifiers

PMID35226681
PMCPMC8884485
OpenAlexW4214612763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.