ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
In heart failure reactivation of RNA-binding proteins is associated with the expression of 1,523 fetal-specific isoforms.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac fibroblast deletion of PTBP1 modulates the profibrotic response by alternative splicing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- RNA splicing and cardiovascular disease: a guide for cardiologists.European heart journal · 2026Review
- An integrative single-nucleus multiomic atlas of the human left ventricle identifies gene regulatory network dynamics across cardiac development, aging, and disease.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Transcriptional regulation in heart development, disease and regeneration: reassessing the fetal gene hypothesis.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Integrative Proteomic and Bioenergetic Profiling Reveals Diet- and Strain-Specific Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Cohen Diabetic Rat Hearts.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cardioprotective role of RBFox1 in myocardial infarction-induced heart failure.Cardiovascular research · 2025Article
- A ratiometric catalog of protein isoform shifts in the cardiac fetal gene program.JCI insight · 2025Article
- Decoding Cardiac Maturation Program: Insights from RNA Splicing Regulation.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Cardiac Fibrosis in the Multi-Omics Era: Implications for Heart Failure.Circulation research · 2025Review
- Multiomic QTL mapping reveals phenotypic complexity of GWAS loci and prioritizes putative causal variants.Cell genomics · 2025Article
- RNA binding proteins (RBPs) on genetic stability and diseases.Global medical genetics · 2025Review
- IFNγ activates an immune-like regulatory network in the cardiac vascular endothelium.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2025Article
- Rbm24-mediated post-transcriptional regulation of skeletal and cardiac muscle development, function and regeneration.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2025Review
- RNA binding protein with multiple splicing (RBPMS) promotes contractile phenotype splicing in human embryonic stem cell-derived vascular smooth muscle cells.Cardiovascular research · 2024Article
- Alternative Splicing in the Heart: The Therapeutic Potential of Regulating the Regulators.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The Biological Mechanisms and Clinical Roles of RNA-Binding Proteins in Cardiovascular Diseases.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Cardiac Development Long Non-Coding RNA (Cells · 2024Article
- RNA-binding proteins in cardiovascular biology and disease: the beat goes on.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024Review
- RNA-Binding Proteins in Cardiomyopathies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Development and disease-specific regulation of RNA splicing in cardiovascular system.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Reactivation of fetal-specific genes and isoforms occurs during heart failure. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms and the extent to which the fetal program switch occurs remains unclear. Limitations hindering transcriptome-wide analyses of alternative splicing differences (i.e. isoform switching) in cardiovascular system (CVS) tissues between fetal, healthy adult and heart failure have included both cellular heterogeneity across bulk RNA-seq samples and limited availability of fetal tissue for research. To overcome these limitations, we have deconvoluted the cellular compositions of 996 RNA-seq samples representing heart failure, healthy adult (heart and arteria), and fetal-like (iPSC-derived cardiovascular progenitor cells) CVS tissues. Comparison of the expression profiles revealed that reactivation of fetal-specific RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), and the accompanied re-expression of 1,523 fetal-specific isoforms, contribute to the transcriptome differences between heart failure and healthy adult heart. Of note, isoforms for 20 different RBPs were among those that reverted in heart failure to the fetal-like expression pattern. We determined that, compared with adult-specific isoforms, fetal-specific isoforms encode proteins that tend to have more functions, are more likely to harbor RBP binding sites, have canonical sequences at their splice sites, and contain typical upstream polypyrimidine tracts. Our study suggests that compared with healthy adult, fetal cardiac tissue requires stricter transcriptional regulation, and that during heart failure reversion to this stricter transcriptional regulation occurs. Furthermore, we provide a resource of cardiac developmental stage-specific and heart failure-associated genes and isoforms, which are largely unexplored and can be exploited to investigate novel therapeutics for heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.