Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35226660›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

RNA-Seq is not required to determine stable reference genes for qPCR normalization.

Nirmal Kumar Sampathkumar, Venkat Krishnan Sundaram, Prakroothi S Danthi, Rasha Barakat, Shiden Solomon, Mrityunjoy Mondal, Ivo Carre, Tatiana El Jalkh, Aïda Padilla-Ferrer, Julien Grenier and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 2-Butoxytetrahydrofuran, Isolated fromACS chemical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Nirmal Kumar SampathkumarUK-Dementia Research Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Venkat Krishnan SundaramINSERM U1124, Université de Paris, Faculty of Basic and Biomedical Sciences, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6024-6959
Prakroothi S DanthiMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, The Douglas Research Center, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Rasha BarakatINSERM U1124, Université de Paris, Faculty of Basic and Biomedical Sciences, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2371-9109
Shiden SolomonUK-Dementia Research Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2239-0447
Mrityunjoy MondalUK-Dementia Research Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2973-4633
Ivo CarreUK-Dementia Research Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3849-8866
Tatiana El JalkhINSERM U1124, Université de Paris, Faculty of Basic and Biomedical Sciences, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6989-4132
Aïda Padilla-FerrerINSERM U1124, Université de Paris, Faculty of Basic and Biomedical Sciences, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7797-9155
Julien GrenierINSERM U1124, Université de Paris, Faculty of Basic and Biomedical Sciences, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1897-1329
Charbel MassaadINSERM U1124, Université de Paris, Faculty of Basic and Biomedical Sciences, Paris, France.
Jacqueline C MitchellDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Inserm · FRKing's College London · GBMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of differential gene expression by qPCR is heavily influenced by the choice of reference genes. Although numerous statistical approaches have been proposed to determine the best reference genes, they can give rise to conflicting results depending on experimental conditions. Hence, recent studies propose the use of RNA-Seq to identify stable genes followed by the application of different statistical approaches to determine the best set of reference genes for qPCR data normalization. In this study, however, we demonstrate that the statistical approach to determine the best reference genes from commonly used conventional candidates is more important than the preselection of 'stable' candidates from RNA-Seq data. Using a qPCR data normalization workflow that we have previously established; we show that qPCR data normalization using conventional reference genes render the same results as stable reference genes selected from RNA-Seq data. We validated these observations in two distinct cross-sectional experimental conditions involving human iPSC derived microglial cells and mouse sciatic nerves. These results taken together show that given a robust statistical approach for reference gene selection, stable genes selected from RNA-Seq data do not offer any significant advantage over commonly used reference genes for normalizing qPCR assays.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesExome SequencingMiceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID35226660
PMCPMC8912902
OpenAlexW4221073377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.