Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35226552›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2022

Systematic Review of Discourse and Social Communication Interventions in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Karen Lê, Carl Coelho, Joanna Fiszdon

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen LêAudiology and Speech Pathology Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven.ORCID 0000-0002-7105-1919
Carl CoelhoDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Connecticut, Mansfield.ORCID 0000-0001-9899-2500
Joanna FiszdonPsychology Service, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven.
University of Connecticut · USVA Connecticut Healthcare System · USYale University · US

Funding

Remediating narrative discourse impairments in veterans with TBI: Initial treatment developmentIK2RX003494 · VA · VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI Karen Le · 2022 to 2026
–
RRD VA IK2 RX003494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study reviewed the current state of discourse and social communication interventions in traumatic brain injury (TBI) to provide clinically focused guidance about treatment efficacy, treatment approaches by TBI severity, treatment components, and treatment outcome measures.

methodSearches were conducted in five electronic databases and reference lists of topical articles for discourse or social communication interventions in TBI published between 2012 and 2021. Search terms reflected three concepts: TBI, treatment, and cognitive-communication. Studies were evaluated for methodological quality using rating scales specific to study design.

resultsSeven hundred sixty-seven records were identified, culminating in 21 studies for qualitative synthesis. All approaches resulted in improvement posttreatment, but durability and strength of evidence varied. Five treatment components were identified as "essential" for fostering change. Discourse approaches were generally more effective in mild-to-moderate TBI, whereas social communication approaches were more effective in moderate-to-severe TBI. Communication outcome measures were generally more sensitive to change than measures of other domains of functioning.

conclusionsThe evidence suggests that discourse and social communication treatments are promising for improving communication in TBI. Selection of treatment components and tailoring treatment to the individual are important clinical considerations. Use of at least two proximal outcome measures that evaluate the target behavior and extent of functional generalization may be advantageous. The field would benefit from additional, more rigorous treatment studies to provide a greater understanding of how best to treat cognitive-communicative impairments in people with TBI. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19233516.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticCommunication DisordersCommunicationHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35226552
PMCPMC11307254
OpenAlexW4214486443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.