Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35226357›Full record

Trial reportCancer2022

A prediction model for early systemic recurrence in breast cancer using a molecular diagnostic analysis of sentinel lymph nodes: A large-scale, multicenter cohort study.

Tomo Osako, Masaaki Matsuura, Daisuke Yotsumoto, Shin Takayama, Koji Kaneko, Mina Takahashi, Kenzo Shimazu, Katsuhide Yoshidome, Kazuya Kuraoka, Masayuki Itakura and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A practical recurrence risk model based on Lasso-Cox regression for gastric cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomo OsakoDivision of Pathology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9250-4035
Masaaki MatsuuraDivision of Cancer Genomics, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke YotsumotoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hakuaikai Sagara Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Shin TakayamaDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji KanekoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Mina TakahashiDepartment of Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Ehime, Japan.
Kenzo ShimazuDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0837-2357
Katsuhide YoshidomeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuya KuraokaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center/Chugoku Cancer Center, Hiroshima, Japan.
Masayuki ItakuraDivision of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Shimane University Hospital, Shimane, Japan.
Mayumi TaniDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Nihon University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi IshikawaDepartment of Breast Oncology and Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuyo OhiDepartment of Pathology, Hakuaikai Sagara Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Takayuki KinoshitaDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuaki SatoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Masahiko TsujimotoDepartment of Pathology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Seigo NakamuraDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitoshi TsudaDepartment of Basic Pathology, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.
Shinzaburo NoguchiDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Futoshi AkiyamaDivision of Pathology, Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPNiigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPOsaka Police Hospital · JPThe University of Osaka · JPBreast Center · CHKagoshima University Hospital · JPNational Defense Medical College · JPNational Hospital Organization · JPNihon University · JPShikoku Cancer Center · JPShimane University Hospital · JPShowa University · JPTokyo Medical Center · JPTokyo Medical University · JPTokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay can quantify the cytokeratin 19 messenger RNA copy number as a proxy for sentinel lymph node (SN) metastasis in breast cancer. A large-scale, multicenter cohort study was performed to determine the prognostic value of the SN tumor burden based on a molecular readout and to establish a model for the prediction of early systemic recurrence in patients using the OSNA assay.

methodsSN biopsies from 4757 patients with breast cancer were analyzed with the OSNA assay. The patients were randomly assigned to the training or validation cohort at a ratio of 2:1. On the basis of the training cohort, the threshold SN tumor burden value for stratifying distant recurrence was determined with Youden's index; predictors of distant recurrence were investigated via multivariable analyses. Based on the selected predictors, a model for estimating 5-year distant recurrence-free survival was constructed, and predictive performance was measured with the validation cohort.

resultsThe prognostic cutoff value for the SN tumor burden was 1100 copies/μL. The following variables were significantly associated with distant recurrence and were used to construct the prediction model: SN tumor burden, age, pT classification, grade, progesterone receptor, adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy, and adjuvant anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapy. The values for the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the prediction model were 0.83, 63.4%, 81.7%, and 81.1%, respectively.

conclusionsUsing the OSNA assay, the molecular readout-based SN tumor burden is an independent prognostic factor for early breast cancer. This model accurately predicts early systemic recurrence and may facilitate decision-making related to treatment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSentinel Lymph NodeBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPathology, MolecularBiomarkers, Tumorbreast cancercytokeratin 19multicenter studyone-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assayprediction modelsentinel lymph nodetotal tumor load

Identifiers

PMID35226357
PMCPMC9311203
OpenAlexW4214724470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.