Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35226346›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2022

Cost-Effectiveness of Hybrid Closed Loop Insulin Pumps Versus Multiple Daily Injections Plus Intermittently Scanned Glucose Monitoring in People With Type 1 Diabetes in The Netherlands.

Erik H Serné, Stéphane Roze, Maria I Buompensiere, William J Valentine, Simona De Portu, Harold W de Valk

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The role of advanced technologies in improving diabetes outcomes.The American journal of managed care · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Erik H SernéAmsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stéphane RozeVyoo Agency, Lyon, France.
Maria I BuompensiereMedtronic International Trading Sàrl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland.
William J ValentineOssian Health Economics and Communications GmbH, Bäumleingasse 20, 4051, Basel, Switzerland. valentine@ossianconsulting.com.
Simona De PortuMedtronic International Trading Sàrl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland.
Harold W de ValkUniversity Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Medtronic (Switzerland) · CHAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHybrid closed loop (HCL) insulin pump systems and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (IS-CGM) are increasingly used by individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The aim of the analysis was to compare the long-term cost-effectiveness of the MiniMed 670G HCL system versus IS-CGM plus multiple daily injections of insulin (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in adults with T1D in the Netherlands.

methodsThe analysis was performed using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model with clinical input data sourced from observational studies. Simulated patients were assumed to have a baseline HbA1c of 7.8%. Use of the MiniMed 670G system was assumed to reduce HbA1c by 0.4% and confer a quality-of-life (QoL) benefit through reduced fear of hypoglycemia (FoH). The analysis was performed from a societal perspective over a lifetime time horizon; future costs and clinical outcomes pertaining to the Netherlands were used and discounted at 4% and 1.5% per annum, respectively.

resultsUse of the MiniMed 670G HCL system was projected to improve mean quality-adjusted life expectancy by 2.231 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus IS-CGM. Total mean lifetime costs were EUR 13,683 higher with the MiniMed 670G system resulting in an ICER of EUR 6133 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses revealed findings to be sensitive to changes in assumptions around severe hypoglycemic event rates and the (QoL) benefit associated with reduced FoH.

conclusionsOver patient lifetimes, for adults with long-standing T1D in the Netherlands, use of the MiniMed 670G system is projected to be cost-effective versus IS-CGM plus MDI or CSII.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1HypoglycemiaAdultBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringCost-Benefit AnalysisGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsNetherlandsQuality of LifeBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinCost-effectiveness; type 1 diabetesHybrid closed loopNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID35226346
OpenAlexW4214650253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.