Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35226313›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

PCR Methods for the Generation of Catalytic ssDNA.

Deni Szokoli, Kristian K Le Vay, Hannes Mutschler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deni SzokoliBiomimetic Systems, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Kristian K Le VayBiomimetic Systems, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Hannes MutschlerBiomimetic Systems, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany. hannes.mutschler@tu-dortmund.de.
TU Dortmund University · DEMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to produce single-stranded DNA on a preparative scale from low amounts of starting templates is necessary for most research involving deoxyribozymes, but is particularly important for performing in vitro selections. While the production of single-stranded RNA is straightforward by means of in vitro transcription, the enzymatic production of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) on a preparative scale is often difficult. Nevertheless, several methods for the production of ssDNA have been published over the years. Here, we present two PCR methods that we find to be particularly effective, fast, and affordable, which we have adapted for our own needs.

Indexed as

DNA, Single-StrandedNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesDNA PrimersPolymerase Chain ReactionRNADNA PrimersDNA, Single-StrandedRNA10–23 DNAzymeDNAzyme preparationPolymerase chain reaction (PCR)ssDNA library recoveryssDNA production

Identifiers

PMID35226313
OpenAlexW4214485173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.