ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2022
A multi-surgeon learning curve analysis of overall and site-specific positive surgical margins after RARP and implications for training.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of a cadaveric porcine Pseudotumor model for Oral Cancer biopsy and resection training.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- AI-based anatomical recognition for bladder neck dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.BJU international · 2026Article
- Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system: 100 consecutive cases, 1-year follow-up and surgical learning curve evaluation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Effect of radical prostatectomy on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- The Role of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the Management of Prostate Cancer and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2025Article
- Learning Curves in Robotic Urological Oncological Surgery: Has Anything Changed During the Last Five Years?Cancers · 2025Review
- Hugo™ Versus daVinci™ Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: 1-Year Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Functional and Oncological Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Hugo™ RAS System: Initial Experience at a High-Volume Robotic Centre.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Initial surgical performance in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with clinical outcomes and learning curves.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Development of preoperative nomograms to predict the risk of overall and multifocal positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
- Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy with Hugo™ RAS versus daVinci Surgical Platform: Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed with the Novel Hugo™ RAS System: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy by Lateral Approach: Technique, Reproducibility and Outcomes.Cancers · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the most adopted treatment for localized prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the learning curves (LC) for overall and site-specific positive surgical margins (PSM) occurrence after RARP of multiple surgeons within a step-structured mentor-initiated training program. The study included consecutive patients undergoing RARP between January 2013 and March 2020, by three surgeons: a mentor and his two trainees. Prospectively collected patients' data were retrospectively analyzed. The cumulative summation (CUSUM) method was used to generate the LCs, with turning points indicating the number of cases to reach proficiency levels. Furthermore, the association between PSM and surgical experience was evaluated, adjusting for case mix. A total of 761 consecutive patients were included, 370 treated by the Mentor surgeon, 247 and 144 treated, respectively, by the two Trainees. Mentor and Trainees had similar PSM rates (31.6% vs 28.0% vs 31.3%, p = 0.6). CUSUM charts showed different LC shapes for different PSM locations (postero-lateral, bladder neck, apex, and multifocal/> 3 mm). Surgical experience was significantly associated with overall, postero-lateral, and multifocal/> 3 mm PSMs, in the Mentor series only. Trainees reached their turning points after far fewer cases then the Mentor, both for overall (12 and 31 vs 153), postero-lateral (24 and 30 vs 120), and multifocal/> 3 mm PSMs (9 and 31 vs 153). The achievement of stable SM proficiency takes involved different LCs depending on the prostatic location being considered. Monitoring site-specific LC can indicate the surgical steps for which there may be still room for further technical refinements, even when an apparent proficiency status seems achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.