ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2022
Treatment and outcome of pediatric intracranial ependymoma after first relapse.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Supratentorial ependymoma: a comprehensive review of molecular classification, management strategies, and clinical outcomes (Part II of pediatric ependymomas across compartments).Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Reirradiation for Patients With Recurrent Ependymoma Across the Age Spectrum.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical Features and Prognostic Indicators for Brainstem Ependymomas : A Population-Based Retrospective Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database Analysis.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Prognostic Factors and Nomogram for Malignant Brainstem Ependymoma: A Population-Based Retrospective Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Conditional survival estimates for ependymomas reveal the dynamic nature of prognostication.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Outcomes following management of relapsed pediatric posterior fossa ependymoma in the molecular era.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlmost 50% of children with intracranial ependymoma experience disease relapse, and their outcomes are extremely poor. The aim of this study was to investigate optimal salvage treatment for pediatric intracranial ependymoma after the first relapse and to identify prognostic factors affecting survival.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 159 children who underwent initial treatment for intracranial ependymoma at Beijing Tiantan Hospital from 2013 to 2017.
resultsRelapse was observed in 73 patients (73/159; 45.9%), with a median age of 7.2 ± 3.5 years old. Molecular subgrouping analysis identified H3K27me3-negative PF-EPNs in 74% of patients, ST-RELA EPNs in 21% of patients, and H3K27me3-positive PF-EPNs in 5% of patients. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates after first relapse were 21.1% (95% CI 16.0-26.2) and 30.5% (95% CI 19.8-30.8), respectively. Patients with GTR at first relapse had higher 5-year EFS and 5-year OS than those with STR (P = 0.031 and P = 0.003) or no surgery (P = 0.007 and P = 0.001). Radiotherapy or re-radiotherapy at first relapse significantly prolonged 5-year EFS and OS (both P < 0.001). Patients with H3K27me3-negative PF-EPN had worse 5-year EFS and OS than those with ST-RELA EPN (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that both tumor resection and radiotherapy at first relapse had independent prognostic significance for survival (all P < 0.05).
conclusionChildren with recurrent intracranial EPN have poor outcomes, and surgery and radiotherapy at first relapse should be encouraged to improve their prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.