ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022
Robot-assisted techniques in vascular and endovascular surgery.
Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robotic-assisted surgery in vascular surgery: a 29-year bibliometric analysis and emerging research trends.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic surgery in abdominal aortoiliac aneurysm and occlusive disease: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- ESR Innovation in Focus: Robotics applications for interventional radiology.European radiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Fully Teleoperated Robotic Endovascular Interventions with Haptic Feedback: The SENTANTE Endovascular Robotic System.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Advancements and challenges in autonomous endovascular interventional robotics: A comprehensive review.iScience · 2025Review
- Robotic-Assisted Vascular Surgery: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing orthognathic surgery: A clinical case study of an edentulous HCV positive patient utilizing a novel device: A clinical case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating robotic and laparoscopic approaches for left and right colon carcinoma: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Materials Advances in Devices for Heart Disease Interventions.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Improved genetic algorithm based on greedy and simulated annealing ideas for vascular robot ordering strategy.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Performance Evaluation of a Miniature and Disposable Endovascular Robotic Device.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024Article
- The impact of the first and the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on vascular surgery practice in the leading regional center: a comparative, retrospective study.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Clinical applications of robotic surgery platforms: a comprehensive review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- A multifunctional soft robot for cardiac interventions.Science advances · 2023Article
- Image-to-Patient Registration in Computer-Assisted Surgery of Head and Neck: State-of-the-Art, Perspectives, and Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Current State of Robotics in Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023Review
- Quantifying and Statistically Modeling Residual Pneumoperitoneum after Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Single-Center, Observational Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Bioengineering, augmented reality, and robotic surgery in vascular surgery: A literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For thousands of years, robots have inspired the imagination of humans, but it was only about 35 years ago that a robot was used for the first time in medicine. Since then, robot-assisted procedures have become increasingly popular in urology, general surgical specialties, and gynecology. Robot-assisted vascular surgery was first introduced in 2002 and was thought to overcome the limitations of laparoscopy. However, it did not gain widespread popularity, and its usage is still limited to a few centers worldwide. Robot-assisted endovascular procedures, on the other hand, while still in its infancy, have become a promising alternative to existing techniques. The improvements of the robotic systems promote better surgical performance and reduce occupational hazards for vascular and endovascular surgeons. A comprehensive review of literature was performed using the search terms "robotic," "robot assisted," "vascular surgery," and "aortic" for surgical procedures or "robotic," "robot assisted," and "endovascular" for endovascular procedures. Full text articles that were published between January 1990 and March 2021 were included. This review summarizes the development of the techniques for robot-assisted vascular and endovascular surgery in recent years, its outcomes, advantages, disadvantages, and perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.