Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35226165›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2022

Sleep of recruits throughout basic military training and its relationships with stress, recovery, and fatigue.

Sean Bulmer, Brad Aisbett, Jace R Drain, Spencer Roberts, Paul B Gastin, Jamie Tait, Luana C Main

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Characterising Psycho-Physiological Responses and Relationships during a Military Field Training Exercise.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Factors Predicting Training Delays and Attrition of Recruits during Basic Military Training.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sean BulmerSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Centre for Sport Research, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1872-9070
Brad AisbettSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Geelong, VIC, 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-0272
Jace R DrainDefence Science and Technology Group, Fisherman's Bend, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7945-0041
Spencer RobertsSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Geelong, VIC, 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9095-7070
Paul B GastinSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2320-7875
Jamie TaitSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Geelong, VIC, 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5792-9430
Luana C MainSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Geelong, VIC, 3125, Australia. luana.main@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9576-9466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStudies in basic military training (BMT) examining sleep are largely cross-sectional, and do not investigate relationships between sleep, stress, recovery and fatigue. The aims of this study were to (1a) quantify changes in recruits' sleep quantity and quality over 12 weeks of BMT; (1b) quantify changes in recruits' perceptions of stress, fatigue and recovery over BMT; and (2) explore relationships between sleep, and perceptions of stress, fatigue and recovery.

methods45 recruits (37 male; 8 female, age: 25.2 ± 7.2 years, height: 176.2 ± 10.0 cm, mass: 76.8 ± 15.0 kg) wore ActiGraph GT9X's for 12 weeks of BMT, collecting sleep duration, efficiency and awakenings. Subjective sleep quality, fatigue were measured daily, with stress and recovery measured weekly. Multi-level models assessed relationships between sleep, and stress, recovery, and fatigue.

resultsObjective daily means for sleep duration were 6.3 h (± 1.2 h) and 85.6% (± 5.5%) for sleep efficiency. Main effects were detected for all mean weekly values (p < 0.05). Sleep quality showed the strongest relationships with stress, recovery and fatigue. The best model to explain relationships between, stress, recovery and fatigue, included sleep quality, sleep duration, sleep efficiency and awakenings.

conclusionsThe reported mean sleep duration of 6.3 h per night may negatively impact training outcomes across BMT. Combining both subjective and objective measures of sleep best explained relationships between sleep metrics stress, fatigue and recovery. Perceived sleep quality was most strongly related to change in stress, recovery, or post-sleep fatigue.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelSleep Wake DisordersAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFatigueFemaleHumansMaleSleepYoung AdultArmyRecoveryRecruitsSleepSRSSStressWell-beingWorkload

Identifiers

PMID35226165
PMCPMC9273528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.