Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35226081›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2022

Effect of S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Fluorouracil, Leucovorin Plus Oxaliplatin as Perioperative Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced, Resectable Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jiren Yu, Yuan Gao, Li Chen, Dan Wu, Qianyun Shen, Zhicheng Zhao, Weihuai Liu, Hanliang Yang, Qi Zhang, Xinbao Wang and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01364376 (S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Fluorouracil, Leucovorin Calcium Plus Oxaliplatin as Perioperative Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01364376 nacompletednot on this map

S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Fluorouracil, Leucovorin Calcium Plus Oxaliplatin as Perioperative Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Carcinoma: a Multi-center, Open-labeled, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZhejiang UniversityRan2011 to 2016Enrolled583ConditionsStomach NeoplasmsArmsS-1, Oxaliplatin, 5-Fu, Leucovorin Calcium
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Research progress of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Jiren YuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yuan GaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Li ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Dan WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qianyun ShenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zhicheng ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Weihuai LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Beilun District People's Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Hanliang YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xinbao WangDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Ping HuDepartment of General Surgery, The Central Hospital of Lishui City, Lishui, China.
Zhiqiang ZhengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China.
Xianfa WangDepartment of General Surgery, The Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical School Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Hongjun LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, China.
Zekuan XuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zhilong YanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Yingjie WuDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Mingjuan JinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Qing ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaosun LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Kankai ZhuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Chunhui ShouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNCancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences · CNLishui Central Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CNNingbo First Hospital · CNNingbo University · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversity of Nottingham Ningbo China · CNWenzhou Medical University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePerioperative chemotherapy is a potential treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen remains unknown.

objectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) vs fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) as a perioperative chemotherapy regimen for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsIn this phase 3, open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, patients from 12 Chinese hospitals were enrolled between June 2011 and August 2016, with a last follow-up date of September 2019. The primary tumor was evaluated as either invading the serosa or the adjacent structures with or without metastatic lymph nodes, and with no evidence of distant metastases. Data were analyzed from December 2019 to June 2020.

interventionsPatients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 6 perioperative (2-4 preoperative and 2-4 postoperative) 3-week cycles of 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on day 1 and 80 to 120 mg/d S-1 orally daily for 2 weeks (SOX) or 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin, 400 mg/m2 fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2 leucovorin, and 2400 mg/m2 fluorouracil as 46-hour infusion on day 1 (FOLFOX). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was 3-year overall survival (OS). An absolute noninferiority margin of -8% was chosen.

resultsA total of 583 patients were enrolled; 293 were randomized to the SOX group and 290 were randomized to the FOLFOX group. Twelve patients (2.1%) refused preoperative chemotherapy (5 patients in the SOX group and 7 patients in the FOLFOX group), leaving a total of 288 patients in the SOX group (median [range] age, 61 [24 to 78] years; 197 men [68.4%]) and 283 patients in the FOLFOX group (median [range] age, 62 [24 to 80] years; 209 men [73.9%]) who received preoperative chemotherapy. The 3-year OS rate was 75.2% (95% CI, 70.3% to 80.5%) in the SOX group and 67.8% (95% CI, 62.5% to 73.5%) in the FOLFOX group. The absolute difference of 3-year OS rate between the 2 groups was 7.4% (95% CI, -0.1% to 14.9%), which was greater than the prespecified noninferiority margin (-8%) and showed the noninferiority of perioperative chemotherapy with SOX compared with FOLFOX. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, SOX was noninferior to FOLFOX as perioperative chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer and could be recommended as an alternative treatment for these patients in Asia.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01364376.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOxaliplatinFluorouracilLeucovorinOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID35226081
PMCPMC8886520
OpenAlexW4214492305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.