Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35226053›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2022

Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement vs Supportive Group Therapy for Co-occurring Opioid Misuse and Chronic Pain in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Eric L Garland, Adam W Hanley, Yoshio Nakamura, John W Barrett, Anne K Baker, Sarah E Reese, Michael R Riquino, Brett Froeliger, Gary W Donaldson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02602535 (Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement For Chronic Pain and Prescription Opioid Misuse in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 95 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
25.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02602535 nacompletednot on this map

Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement For Chronic Pain and Prescription Opioid Misuse in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2016 to 2020Enrolled250ConditionsChronic Pain, Opioid Use DisordersArmsMindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement, Support Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Eric L GarlandCenter on Mindfulness and Integrative Health Intervention Development, College of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Adam W HanleyCenter on Mindfulness and Integrative Health Intervention Development, College of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Yoshio NakamuraPain Research Center, Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
John W BarrettCommunity Physicians Group, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Anne K BakerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Sarah E ReeseSchool of Social Work, University of Montana, Missoula.
Michael R RiquinoSchool of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
Brett FroeligerDepartment of Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia.
Gary W DonaldsonPain Research Center, Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
University of Utah · USDuke University · USUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of Montana · USVA Salt Lake City Healthcare System · US

Funding

Targeting Hedonic Dysregulation to Address Chronic Pain and Opioid Misuse in Primary Care.R01DA042033 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GARLAND, ERIC LEE · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceSuccessful treatment of opioid misuse among people with chronic pain has proven elusive. Guidelines recommend nonopioid therapies, but the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions for opioid misuse is uncertain.

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) for the reduction of opioid misuse and chronic pain. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis interviewer-blinded randomized clinical trial enrolled patients from primary care clinics in Utah between January 4, 2016, and January 16, 2020. The study included 250 adults with chronic pain receiving long-term opioid therapy who were misusing opioid medications.

interventionsTreatment with MORE (comprising training in mindfulness, reappraisal, and savoring positive experiences) or supportive group psychotherapy (control condition) across 8 weekly 2-hour group sessions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were (1) opioid misuse assessed by the Drug Misuse Index (self-report, interview, and urine screen) and (2) pain severity and pain-related functional interference, assessed by subscale scores on the Brief Pain Inventory through 9 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were opioid dose, emotional distress, and ecological momentary assessments of opioid craving. The minimum intervention dose was defined as 4 or more completed sessions of MORE or supportive group psychotherapy.

resultsAmong 250 participants (159 women [63.6%]; mean [SD] age, 51.8 [11.9] years), 129 were randomized to the MORE group and 121 to the supportive psychotherapy group. Overall, 17 participants (6.8%) were Hispanic or Latino, 218 (87.2%) were White, and 15 (6.0%) were of other races and/or ethnicities (2 American Indian, 3 Asian, 1 Black, 2 Pacific Islander, and 7 did not specify). At baseline, the mean duration of pain was 14.7 years (range, 1-60 years), and the mean (SD) morphine-equivalent opioid dose was 101.0 (266.3) mg (IQR, 16.0-90.0 mg). A total of 203 participants (81.2%) received the minimum intervention dose (mean [SD], 5.7 [2.2] sessions); at 9 months, 92 of 250 participants (36.8%) discontinued the study. The overall odds ratio for reduction in opioid misuse through the 9-month follow-up period in the MORE group compared with the supportive psychotherapy group was 2.06 (95% CI, 1.17-3.61; P = .01). At 9 months, 36 of 80 participants (45.0%) in the MORE group were no longer misusing opioids compared with 19 of 78 participants (24.4%) in the supportive psychotherapy group. Mixed models demonstrated that MORE was superior to supportive psychotherapy through 9 months of follow-up for pain severity (between-group effect: 0.49; 95% CI, 0.17-0.81; P = .003) and pain-related functional interference (between-group effect: 1.07; 95% CI, 0.64-1.50; P < .001). Participants in the MORE group reduced their opioid dose to a greater extent than those in the supportive psychotherapy group. The MORE group also had lower emotional distress and opioid craving. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, among adult participants in a primary care setting, the MORE intervention led to sustained improvements in opioid misuse and chronic pain symptoms and reductions in opioid dosing, emotional distress, and opioid craving compared with supportive group psychotherapy. Despite attrition caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the vulnerability of the sample, MORE appeared to be efficacious for reducing opioid misuse among adults with chronic pain.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02602535.

Indexed as

Chronic PainCOVID-19MindfulnessOpioid-Related DisordersPsychotherapy, GroupAdultAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPandemicsPrimary Health CareAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID35226053
PMCPMC8886485
OpenAlexW4214671105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.