Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35225985›Full record

ReviewProteomes2022

Shotgun Proteomics as a Powerful Tool for the Study of the Proteomes of Plants, Their Pathogens, and Plant-Pathogen Interactions.

Sadegh Balotf, Richard Wilson, Robert S Tegg, David S Nichols, Calum R Wilson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proteomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond Resistance Genes: Silencing Susceptibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Unveiling the Secrets of Oil Palm Genetics: A Look into Omics Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Incorporating omics-based tools into endophytic fungal research.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bottom-Up Proteomics: Advancements in Sample Preparation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Osmoprotectants play a major role in theFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  20. EndophyticMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sadegh BalotfNew Town Research Laboratories, Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, New Town, TAS 7008, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9949-8571
Richard WilsonCentral Science Laboratory, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0152-4394
Robert S TeggNew Town Research Laboratories, Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, New Town, TAS 7008, Australia.
David S NicholsCentral Science Laboratory, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8066-3132
Calum R WilsonNew Town Research Laboratories, Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, New Town, TAS 7008, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5434-3816
University of Tasmania · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DP180103337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction between plants and pathogenic microorganisms is a multifaceted process mediated by both plant- and pathogen-derived molecules, including proteins, metabolites, and lipids. Large-scale proteome analysis can quantify the dynamics of proteins, biological pathways, and posttranslational modifications (PTMs) involved in the plant-pathogen interaction. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics has become the preferred method for characterizing proteins at the proteome and sub-proteome (e.g., the phosphoproteome) levels. MS-based proteomics can reveal changes in the quantitative state of a proteome and provide a foundation for understanding the mechanisms involved in plant-pathogen interactions. This review is intended as a primer for biologists that may be unfamiliar with the diverse range of methodology for MS-based shotgun proteomics, with a focus on techniques that have been used to investigate plant-pathogen interactions. We provide a summary of the essential steps required for shotgun proteomic studies of plants, pathogens and plant-pathogen interactions, including methods for protein digestion, identification, separation, and quantification. Finally, we discuss how protein PTMs may directly participate in the interaction between a pathogen and its host plant.

Indexed as

mass spectrometryplant–pathogen interactionpost-translational modificationshotgun proteomics

Identifiers

PMID35225985
PMCPMC8883913
OpenAlexW4206364839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.