Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35225978›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2022

Fixed Prosthetic Restorations and Periodontal Health: A Narrative Review.

Viritpon Srimaneepong, Artak Heboyan, Muhammad Sohail Zafar, Zohaib Khurshid, Anand Marya, Gustavo V O Fernandes, Dinesh Rokaya

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Viritpon SrimaneepongDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8545-2713
Artak HeboyanDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Str. Koryun 2, Yerevan 0025, Armenia.ORCID 0000-0001-8329-3205
Muhammad Sohail ZafarDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al Madinah, Al Munawwarah 41311, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5157-7067
Zohaib KhurshidDepartment of Prosthodontics and Implantology, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al-Hofuf, Al Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-7335
Anand MaryaDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh 12211, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0003-2009-4393
Gustavo V O FernandesPeriodontics and Oral Medicine Department, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3022-4390
Dinesh RokayaDepartment of Clinical Dentistry, Walailak University International College of Dentistry, Walailak University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3854-667X
Chulalongkorn University · THKing Faisal University · SARiphah International University · PKUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Puthisastra · KHWalailak University · THYerevan State Medical University · AM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periodontal health plays an important role in the longevity of prosthodontic restorations. The issues of comparative assessment of prosthetic constructions are complicated and not fully understood. The aim of this article is to review and present the current knowledge regarding the various technical, clinical, and molecular aspects of different prosthetic biomaterials and highlight the interactions between periodontal health and prosthetic restorations. Articles on periodontal health and fixed dental prostheses were searched using the keywords "zirconium", "CAD/CAM", "dental ceramics", "metal-ceramics", "margin fit", "crown", "fixed dental prostheses", "periodontium", and "margin gap" in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Science Direct. Further search criteria included being published in English, and between January 1981 and September 2021. Then, relevant articles were selected, included, and critically analyzed in this review. The margin of discrepancy results in the enhanced accumulation of dental biofilm, microleakage, hypersensitivity, margin discoloration, increased gingival crevicular fluid flow (GCF), recurrent caries, pulp infection and, lastly, periodontal lesion and bone loss, which can lead to the failure of prosthetic treatment. Before starting prosthetic treatment, the condition of the periodontal tissues should be assessed for their oral hygiene status, and gingival and periodontal conditions. Zirconium-based restorations made from computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology provide better results, in terms of marginal fit, inflammation reduction, maintenance, and the restoration of periodontal health and oral hygiene, compared to constructions made by conventional methods, and from other alloys. Compared to subgingival margins, supragingival margins offer better oral hygiene, which can be maintained and does not lead to secondary caries or periodontal disease.

Indexed as

CAD/CAMceramicscobalt-chromiumcrownfixed partial denturegingival crevicular fluidgingival healthgingival inflammationmargin fitperiodontiumzirconia

Identifiers

PMID35225978
PMCPMC8883934
OpenAlexW4210355791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.