ReviewEpigenomes2022
Opportunities for Early Cancer Detection: The Rise of ctDNA Methylation-Based Pan-Cancer Screening Technologies.
Review in Epigenomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early-stage multi-cancer detection through a plasma extracellular vesicle protein signature.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Circulating tumor DNA-guided early detection and minimal residual disease monitoring in pancreatic and biliary cancers: evidence, barriers, and opportunities.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Hereditary cancer syndromes with gynecological cancer risk: focus on prevention strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Detection of Prostate Carcinoma in an Asymptomatic Individual Initiated by an Immunological Biopsy-A Case Report.Oncology research · 2026Article
- Value of circulating free DNA methylation in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Epigenetic and biogenetic regulation by polyphenols in prostate cancer in the context of 3P medicine.The EPMA journal · 2025Review
- Prospective validation study: a non-invasive circulating tumor DNA-based assay for simultaneous early detection of multiple cancers in asymptomatic adults.BMC medicine · 2025Observational
- Epigenomic Echoes-Decoding Genomic and Epigenetic Instability to Distinguish Lung Cancer Types and Predict Relapse.Epigenomes · 2025Review
- Integrating Multi-Cancer Early Detection (MCED) Tests with Standard Cancer Screening: System Dynamics Model Development and Feasibility Testing.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2025Article
- Lung cancer screening in India: Preparing for the future using smart tools & biomarkers to identify highest risk individuals.The Indian journal of medical research · 2024Review
- Recent advances in ctDNA detection using electrochemical biosensor for cancer.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Glycan Profiling in Small Extracellular Vesicles with a SERS Microfluidic Biosensor Identifies Early Malignant Development in Lung Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Combining non-invasive liquid biopsy and a methylation analysis to assess surgical risk for early esophageal cancer.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Translation of Epigenetics in Cell-Free DNA Liquid Biopsy Technology and Precision Oncology.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Deciphering the molecular mechanistic paths describing the chemotherapeutic potential and epigenetic regulation of curcumin in lung cancer: a mini review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024Review
- Review
- Cell-free DNA approaches for cancer early detection and interception.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023Review
- Genomic and Transcriptomic Research in the Discovery and Application of Colorectal Cancer Circulating Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer: Biomarkers for the Management of Recurrence and Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficiency of conventional screening programs to identify early-stage malignancies can be limited by the low number of cancers recommended for screening as well as the high cumulative false-positive rate, and associated iatrogenic burden, resulting from repeated multimodal testing. The opportunity to use minimally invasive liquid biopsy testing to screen asymptomatic individuals at-risk for multiple cancers simultaneously could benefit from the aggregated diseases prevalence and a fixed specificity. Increasing both latter parameters is paramount to mediate high positive predictive value-a useful metric to evaluate a screening test accuracy and its potential harm-benefit. Thus, the use of a single test for multi-cancer early detection (stMCED) has emerged as an appealing strategy for increasing early cancer detection rate efficiency and benefit population health. A recent flurry of these stMCED technologies have been reported for clinical potential; however, their development is facing unique challenges to effectively improve clinical cost-benefit. One promising avenue is the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) for detecting DNA methylation biomarker fingerprints of malignancies-a hallmark of disease aetiology and progression holding the potential to be tissue- and cancer-type specific. Utilizing panels of epigenetic biomarkers could potentially help to detect earlier stages of malignancies as well as identify a tumour of origin from blood testing, useful information for follow-up clinical decision making and subsequent patient care improvement. Overall, this review collates the latest and most promising stMCED methodologies, summarizes their clinical performances, and discusses the specific requirements multi-cancer tests should meet to be successfully implemented into screening guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.