Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35225912›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

In Vitro Study of the Recruitment and Expansion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells at the Interface of a Cu-Doped PCL-Bioglass Scaffold.

Behnaz Malekahmadi, Vahid Esfahanian, Fatemeh Ejeian, Maziar Ebrahimi Dastgurdi, Maria Agheb, Faranak Kaveian, Mohammad Rafienia, Mohammad Hossein Nasr-Esfahani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative Analysis of Gelatin/Polylactic Acid and Commercial PLA Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. 3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Behnaz MalekahmadiIsfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Dental School, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan 8155139998, Iran.
Vahid EsfahanianIsfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Department of Periodontics, Dental School, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan 8155139998, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-6013-8832
Fatemeh EjeianCell Science Research Center, Department of Animal Biotechnology, Royan Institute for Biotechnology, ACECR, Isfahan 8159358686, Iran.
Maziar Ebrahimi DastgurdiPrivate Practitioner (Endodontist), Toronto, ON L3T0C9, Canada.
Maria AghebDepartment of Biomaterials, Tissue Engineering and Nanotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran.
Faranak KaveianBiosensor Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran.
Mohammad RafieniaBiosensor Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran.
Mohammad Hossein Nasr-EsfahaniCell Science Research Center, Department of Animal Biotechnology, Royan Institute for Biotechnology, ACECR, Isfahan 8159358686, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing new barrier membranes with improved biomechanical characteristics has acquired much interest owing to their crucial role in the field of periodontal tissue regeneration. In this regard, we enriched the electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL)/gelatin (Gel) membranes by adding bioglass (BG) or Cu-doped bioglass (CuBG) and examined their cellular adhesion and proliferation potential in the presence of alveolar bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (aBMSCs). The membranes were fabricated and characterized using mechanical strength, SEM, FTIR, EDX, and ICP assay. Besides, aBMSCs were isolated, characterized, and seeded with a density of 35,000 cells in each experimental group. Next, the cellular morphology, cell adhesion capacity, proliferation rate, and membrane antibacterial activity were assessed. The results displayed a significant improvement in the wettability, pore size, and Young's modulus of the PCL membrane following the incorporation of gelatin and CuBG particles. Moreover, all scaffolds exhibited reasonable biocompatibility and bioactivity in physiological conditions. Although the PCL/Gel/CuBG membrane revealed the lowest primary cell attachment, cells were grown properly and reached the confluent state after seven days. In conclusion, we found a reasonable level of attachment and proliferation of aBMSCs on all modified membranes. Meanwhile, a trace amount of Cu provided superiority for PCL/Gel/CuBG in periodontal tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

bioglasscell adhesionGBR barrier membranemesenchymal stem cellsproliferation

Identifiers

PMID35225912
PMCPMC8883986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.