Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35225716›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2023

Use of a High-Fidelity Training Simulator for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Increases Working Knowledge and Technical Skills Among Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Trainees.

Carolin Melcher, Ibrahim Hussain, Sertac Kirnaz, Jacob L Goldberg, Fabian Sommer, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez, Branden Medary, Roger Härtl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Simulation-based learning in orthopaedics:Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carolin MelcherDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ibrahim HussainDepartment of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6343-2228
Sertac KirnazDepartment of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Jacob L GoldbergDepartment of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0827-9387
Fabian SommerDepartment of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6284-7042
Rodrigo Navarro-RamirezDepartment of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Branden MedaryDepartment of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Roger HärtlDepartment of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designProspective comparative study.

objectiveTo quantify the educational benefit to surgical trainees of using a high-fidelity simulator to perform minimally invasive (MIS) unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) for lumbar stenosis.

methodsTwelve orthopedic and neurologic surgery residents performed three MIS ULBD procedures over 2 weeks on a simulator guided by established AO Spine metrics. Video recording of each surgery was rated by three blinded, independent experts using a global rating scale. The learning curve was evaluated with attention to technical skills, skipped steps, occurrence of errors, and timing. A knowledge gap analysis evaluating participants' current vs desired ability was performed after each trial.

resultsFrom trial 1 to 3, there was a decrease in average procedural time by 31.7 minutes. The cumulative number of skipped steps and surgical errors decreased from 25 to 6 and 24 to 6, respectively. Overall surgical proficiency improved as indicated by video rating of efficiency and smoothness of surgical maneuvers, most notably with knowledge and handling of instruments. The greatest changes were noted in junior rather than senior residents. Average knowledge gap analysis significantly decreased by 30% from the first to last trial (P = .001), signifying trainees performed closer to their desired technical goal.

conclusionProcedural metrics for minimally invasive ULBD in combination with a realistic surgical simulator can be used to improve the skills and confidence of trainees. Surgical simulation may offer an important educational complement to traditional methods of skill acquisition and should be explored further with other MIS techniques.

Indexed as

laminectomylumbarminimally invasivemodelsimulationsimulatorunilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression

Identifiers

PMID35225716
PMCPMC10538343
OpenAlexW4214501436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.