SynthesisThe Journal of international medical research2022
Predictive role of C-reactive protein in sudden death: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Synthesis in The Journal of international medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Trends in Biohumoral Screening for the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- Risk factors for sudden cardiac death or sudden unexplained death in patients treated with clozapine: systematic review.BJPsych open · 2026Review
- Impact of initial high sensitivity C-reactive protein on outcomes in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: an observational study.Future cardiology · 2024Observational
- Anthracycline's Effects on Heart Rate Variability in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Early Toxicity Signs-Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- C-Reactive Protein: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, False Test Results and a Novel Diagnostic Algorithm for Clinicians.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveC-reactive protein (CRP) is a powerful predictor of and risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, the relationship between CRP and sudden death (SD) is controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between CRP and SD.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, China Biology Medicine disc, and Weipu. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the data quality. The overall effect size was meta-analyzed using Stata software version 12.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
resultsTwelve prospective studies involving 36,646 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. The data revealed that patients with higher CRP concentrations had a greater risk of SD (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.29). When the hazard ratio of SD was calculated by multivariate analysis of nine studies, CRP was confirmed to be an independent predictive factor for SD (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.07).
conclusionsThis meta-analysis confirmed that CRP is an independent predictor of SD. These results support the recommendation of recording the CRP concentration for risk assessment of SD in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.