Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35225694›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2023

Can Natural Language Processing and Artificial Intelligence Automate The Generation of Billing Codes From Operative Note Dictations?

Jun S Kim, Andrew Vivas, Varun Arvind, Joseph Lombardi, Jay Reidler, Scott L Zuckerman, Nathan J Lee, Meghana Vulapalli, Eric A Geng, Brian H Cho and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Artificial intelligence agents in orthopaedics: Concepts, capabilities and the road ahead.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jun S KimDepartment of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6114-2673
Andrew VivasDepartment of Neurological Surgery, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Varun ArvindDepartment of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Joseph LombardiDepartment of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center- Och SpineHospital, New York, NY, USA.
Jay ReidlerDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Scott L ZuckermanDepartment of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center- Och SpineHospital, New York, NY, USA.
Nathan J LeeDepartment of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center- Och SpineHospital, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9572-5968
Meghana VulapalliDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center- Och Spine Hospital, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1197-0400
Eric A GengDepartment of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0736-3245
Brian H ChoDepartment of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Kazuaki MorizaneDepartment of Orthopedics, Hayashi Hospital, Echizen, Japan.
Samuel K ChoDepartment of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7511-2486
Ronald A LehmanDepartment of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center- Och SpineHospital, New York, NY, USA.
Lawrence G LenkeDepartment of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center- Och SpineHospital, New York, NY, USA.
Kiehyun Daniel RiewDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center- Och Spine Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective Cohort Study.

objectivesUsing natural language processing (NLP) in combination with machine learning on standard operative notes may allow for efficient billing, maximization of collections, and minimization of coder error. This study was conducted as a pilot study to determine if a machine learning algorithm can accurately identify billing Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes on patient operative notes.

methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of operative notes from patients who underwent elective spine surgery by a single senior surgeon from 9/2015 to 1/2020. Algorithm performance was measured by performing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). A deep learning NLP algorithm and a Random Forest algorithm were both trained and tested on operative notes to predict CPT codes. CPT codes generated by the billing department were compared to those generated by our model.

resultsThe random forest machine learning model had an AUC of .94 and an AUPRC of .85. The deep learning model had a final AUC of .72 and an AUPRC of .44. The random forest model had a weighted average, class-by-class accuracy of 87%. The LSTM deep learning model had a weighted average, class-by-class accuracy 0f 59%.

conclusionsCombining natural language processing with machine learning is a valid approach for automatic generation of CPT billing codes. The random forest machine learning model outperformed the LSTM deep learning model in this case. These models can be used by orthopedic or neurosurgery departments to allow for efficient billing.

Indexed as

billingcodingcurrent procedural terminology codeslong short term, memorymachine learningnatural language processingrandom forest model learningsurgery

Identifiers

PMID35225694
PMCPMC10556904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.