Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35225593›Full record

ArticleBiomacromolecules2022

Humidity Response of Cellulose Thin Films.

David Reishofer, Roland Resel, Jürgen Sattelkow, Wolfgang J Fischer, Katrin Niegelhell, Tamilselvan Mohan, Karin Stana Kleinschek, Heinz Amenitsch, Harald Plank, Tekla Tammelin and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomacromolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Ultrathin water layers on mannosylated gold nanoparticles.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David ReishoferInstitute of Bioproducts and Paper Technology, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 23, Graz 8010, Austria.
Roland ReselInstitute for Solid State Physics, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 16, Graz 8010, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0079-3525
Jürgen SattelkowInstitute for Electron Microscopy and Nanoanalysis, Graz University of Technology, Steyrergasse 17, Graz 8010, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2767-6145
Wolfgang J FischerInstitute of Bioproducts and Paper Technology, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 23, Graz 8010, Austria.
Katrin NiegelhellInstitute of Bioproducts and Paper Technology, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 23, Graz 8010, Austria.
Tamilselvan MohanInstitute of Chemistry and Technology of Biobased Systems, Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 9, Graz 8010, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8569-1642
Karin Stana KleinschekInstitute of Chemistry and Technology of Biobased Systems, Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 9, Graz 8010, Austria.
Heinz AmenitschInstitute for Inorganic Chemistry, Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 9, Graz 8010, Austria.
Harald PlankInstitute for Electron Microscopy and Nanoanalysis, Graz University of Technology, Steyrergasse 17, Graz 8010, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1112-0908
Tekla TammelinHigh Performance Fibre Products, VTT Technical Research Center of Finland Ltd, Espoo FI-02044 VTT, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3248-1801
Eero KontturiDepartment of Bioproducts and Biosystems, School of Chemical Technology, Aalto University, Espoo 02150, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1690-5288
Stefan SpirkInstitute of Bioproducts and Paper Technology, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 23, Graz 8010, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9220-3440
Graz University of Technology · ATAalto University · FIVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulose-water interactions are crucial to understand biological processes as well as to develop tailor made cellulose-based products. However, the main challenge to study these interactions is the diversity of natural cellulose fibers and alterations in their supramolecular structure. Here, we study the humidity response of different, well-defined, ultrathin cellulose films as a function of industrially relevant treatments using different techniques. As treatments, drying at elevated temperature, swelling, and swelling followed by drying at elevated temperatures were chosen. The cellulose films were prepared by spin coating a soluble cellulose derivative, trimethylsilyl cellulose, onto solid substrates followed by conversion to cellulose by HCl vapor. For the highest investigated humidity levels (97%), the layer thickness increased by ca. 40% corresponding to the incorporation of 3.6 molecules of water per anhydroglucose unit (AGU), independent of the cellulose source used. The aforementioned treatments affected this ratio significantly with drying being the most notable procedure (2.0 and 2.6 molecules per AGU). The alterations were investigated in real time with X-ray reflectivity and quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation, equipped with a humidity module to obtain information about changes in the thickness, roughness, and electron density of the films and qualitatively confirmed using grazing incidence small angle X-ray scattering measurements using synchrotron irradiation.

Indexed as

CelluloseWaterHumidityMicroscopy, Atomic ForceQuartz Crystal Microbalance TechniquesCelluloseWater

Identifiers

PMID35225593
PMCPMC8924868
OpenAlexW4214725598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.