ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
International Council of Ophthalmology-Small Incision Cataract Surgery rubric: A roadmap to evaluate cataract surgical skill acquisition during residency training.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the impact of short term manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) training program on trainees with varying prior surgical experience using international council of ophthalmology-ophthalmology surgical competency assessment rubrics (ICO-OSCAR).International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Case study and pilot results: Stepwise approach to teach a resident tube shunt surgery.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024Article
- Surgical skills empowerment of ophthalmology residents in India -Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Wet Laboratory Training in Ophthalmology as a Tool for Formative Assessment.International journal of applied & basic medical researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe International Council of Ophthalmology-Small Incision Cataract Surgery (ICO-SICS) rubric is a tool to grade SICS steps from novice to competent. The study aimed to evaluate the progress of residents' surgical skills by using the ICO-SICS rubric and the perceptions of residents and faculties about its use.
methodsThis prospective educational interventional study, done in the Ophthalmology department between September 2019 and February-2020 included 14 residents and five faculties. Faculties scored residents' SICS by ICO-SICS-rubric (four sessions/resident) and helped them identify three steps as "area of focus" to work upon. Feedback was taken using a semi-structured pretested questionnaire. Focus group discussion was done for residents. Data were entered in MS Excel and analyzed using SPSS. Perception analysis presented as percentage of written responses.
resultsStep-wise rubric score showed improvement for initial SICS steps and wound closure (P < 0.05). Critical surgical steps and scores for three areas of focus steps showed no statistically significant improvement. Three steps as an area of focus changed partly for 11 residents and completely for three residents at the end of 6 months. Perception analysis of faculty and residents showed that the ICO-SICS rubric is a good tool to record surgical performance, identify steps needing improvement and provide structured feedback hence opined to continue it. Residents considered it as an effective learning and assessment tool.
conclusionICO-SICS rubric is a good teaching tool and helps to assess the progress of surgical skills. Identification of areas of poor performance and feedback given motivates them to focus on those areas leading to continuous professional development, resulting in competent surgeons performing SICS surgery independently at the end of the residency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.