ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
Comparison of the clinical outcomes of Eyecryl
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative Rotation and Refractive Efficacy of Toric Intraocular Lenses After Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of Eyecryl toric and Alcon toric intra-ocular lenses - A real world study.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Observational
- Comment on: Comparison of the clinical outcomes of Eyecryl™ and Tecnis® toric intraocular lenses: A real-world study.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Response to comment on: Comparison of the clinical outcomes of EyecrylIndian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and refractive outcomes of cataract patients with astigmatism following implantation of Eyecryl
methodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective study including patients who had undergone phacoemulsification and implantation with either Eyecryl
resultsOne hundred and eight eyes of 76 patients (44 males and 32 females) were analyzed. Twenty-nine patients (38 eyes) received Eyecryl
conclusionBoth Eyecryl
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.