Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35225508›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2022

Visual function tests for glaucoma practice - What is relevant?

Aparna Rao, Debananda Padhy, Anindita Pal, Avik Kumar Roy

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Aparna RaoDepartment of Glaucoma Services, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Debananda PadhyDepartment of Glaucoma Services, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Anindita PalDepartment of Glaucoma Services, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Avik Kumar RoyDepartment of Glaucoma Services, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
L V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma represents one of the most important ocular diseases causing irreversible ganglion cell death. It is one of the most common causes of visual impairment and morbidity in the elderly population. There are various tests for measuring visual function in glaucoma. While visual field remains the undisputed method for screening, diagnosis, and monitoring disease progression, other tests have been studied for their utility in glaucoma practice. This review discusses some of the commonly used tests of visual function that can be routinely used in clinics for glaucoma management. Among the various modalities of testing visual function in glaucoma, this review highlights the tests that are most clinically relevant.

Indexed as

GlaucomaVisual Field TestsAgedDisease ProgressionHumansVisual FieldsContrastfunctional visual acuityglaucomapsychophysical testsvisual function

Identifiers

PMID35225508
PMCPMC9114550
OpenAlexW4214564011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.