Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35225507›Full record

SynthesisIndian journal of ophthalmology2022

Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in short eyes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ankur K Shrivastava, Swatishree Nayak, Ashish Mahobia, Mary Anto, Pranay Pandey

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Accuracy of 11 intraocular lens power calculation formulas in short eyes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ankur K ShrivastavaDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Swatishree NayakDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Ashish MahobiaSaiBaba Eye Hospital, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Mary AntoDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Pranay PandeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review article attempts to evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in short eyes. A thorough literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted for articles published over the past 21 years, up to July 2021. The mean absolute error was compared by using weighted mean difference, whereas odds ratio was used for comparing the percentage of eyes with prediction error within ±0.50 diopter (D) and ±1.0 D of target refraction. Statistical heterogeneity among studies was analyzed by using Chi-square test and I

Indexed as

Lenses, IntraocularPhacoemulsificationAxial Length, EyeBiometryHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularOptics and PhotonicsRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesCataractintraocular lensmean absolute errormedian absolute errorpower calculation formulaeshort eyes

Identifiers

PMID35225507
PMCPMC9114558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.