Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35225450›Full record

SynthesisAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2022

Effectiveness of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) Screening on Cervical Cancer Mortality and Incidence - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ayush Lohiya, Roy Arokiam Daniel, Durgesh Kumar, Cherian Varghese, Rama Shankar Rath, Rizwan S A, Baridalyne Nongkynrih

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. A pilot study of upcycled smartphone-based colposcopy for visual inspection of cervix performed by community healthcare workers in rural Vietnam.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The CryoPop study: Screening for high-grade cervical dysplasia in Karnataka, India.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ayush LohiyaSuper Specialty cancer Institute and Hospital, Lucknow, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1429-7821
Roy Arokiam DanielAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/00
Durgesh KumarSuper Specialty cancer Institute and Hospital, Lucknow, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8548-6083
Cherian VargheseWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6907-0451
Rama Shankar RathAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Gorakhpur, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4586-0525
Rizwan S AICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3140-2614
Baridalyne NongkynrihAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6088-9230
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INNational Institute of Epidemiology · INWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite being a cheap, easy, and commonly used technique for screening early development of cervical cancer, collective evidence on the effect of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) for reducing cervical cancer mortality and incidence are conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of VIA screening on cervical cancer mortality and incidence.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews & Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), World Health Organization's (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Google Scholar to identify studies conducted among women with no history of cervical cancer that assessed effectiveness of VIA on the cervical cancer mortality and incidence. Random effects model was used to estimate incident rate ratio and sensitivity analysis was conducted using Bayesian methods.

resultsOf the included 4 studies, three were cluster randomized trials from India and one was quasi-experimental study done in Thailand. Duration of follow-up ranged from 7 to 12 years. Based on 3 trials, pooled rate-ratio for cervical cancer mortality and all-cause mortality was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.56-0.81, I2=0%) and 0.91 (0.85-0.97, I2=57%), respectively. Pooled rate-ratio of invasive cervical cancer was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.67 - 1.30, I2=84%). Likewise, there was non-significant reduction in incidence of stage IB, >=stage II, and unknown stage cervical cancer.

conclusionsVIA screening may lead to reduction in cervical cancer and all-cause mortality in long run. However, the effectiveness of VIA in preventing invasive cervical cancer is inconclusive.

Indexed as

Acetic AcidAdultBayes TheoremCervix UteriEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceIndiaMiddle AgedNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicPhysical ExaminationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicThailandUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAcetic Acidcervical neoplasiaearly cancer diagnosisScreening

Identifiers

PMID35225450
PMCPMC9272618
OpenAlexW4214491227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.