ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022
Variations in Coronary Revascularization Practices and Their Effect on Long-Term Outcomes.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Between Interventional Cardiologist Practice Characteristics, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Use, and Clinical Outcomes.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026Observational
- Time-varying comparative effectiveness of surgical or percutaneous revascularization on patient-centred outcomes.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Article
- Hospital Variation in Aortic Valve Replacement Approach Selection for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Under 65.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025Article
- Real-world effectiveness of early revascularization in stable coronary artery disease with moderate or severe ischemia.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- Assessment of acute coronary syndromes among patients with left main coronary artery disease in centers with and without cardiac surgery on-site. Data from PL-ACS registry.Cardiology journal · 2025Article
- Hospital and Physician Variability in Revascularization Decisions and Outcomes for Patients With 3-Vessel and Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Article
- Preoperative albumin corrected anion gap is associated with in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- Heart Team Without Borders: Taking the Heart Team Beyond the Institution.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- SCAI Expert Consensus Statement on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Without On-Site Surgical Backup.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background The degree of hospital-level variation in the ratio of percutaneous coronary interventions to coronary artery bypass grafting procedures (PCI:CABG) and the association of the PCI:CABG ratio with clinical outcome are unknown. Methods and Results In a multicenter population-based study conducted in Ontario, Canada, we identified 44 288 patients from 19 institutions who had nonemergent diagnostic angiograms indicating severe multivessel coronary artery disease (2013-2017) and underwent a coronary revascularization procedure within 90 days. Hospitals were divided into tertiles according to their adjusted PCI:CABG ratio into low (0.70-0.85, n=17 487), medium (1.01-1.17, n=15 275), and high (1.18-1.29, n=11 526) ratio institutions. Compared with low PCI:CABG ratio hospitals, hazard ratios (HRs) for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were higher at medium (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.14-1.25) and high ratio (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.15-1.27) hospitals during a median 3.3 (interquartile range 2.1-4.6) years follow-up. When interventional cardiologists performed the diagnostic angiogram, the odds of the patient receiving PCI was higher (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.23-1.52) than when it was performed by noninterventional cardiologists, after accounting for patient characteristics. Having the diagnostic angiogram at an institution without cardiac surgical capabilities was independently associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11), death (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18), and myocardial infarction (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17). Conclusions Patients undergoing diagnostic angiography in hospitals with higher PCI:CABG ratio had higher rates of adverse outcomes, including major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. Presence of on-site cardiac surgery was associated with better survival and lower major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.