ArticleNursing open2022
Development and psychometric evaluation of self-management scale for pregnant woman with gestational diabetes mellitus in China.
Article in Nursing open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decision-making behavior of blood glucose management and its influencing factors in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Impact of Antepartum Case-Based Learning on Glycemic Control and Self-Management Skills in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Patient-Centered Non-Parallel Quasi-Experimental Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Article
- Anxiety and depression among perinatal women during the long-term normal prevention of COVID-19 pandemic period in China: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Development of a risk assessment scale for perinatal venous thromboembolism in Chinese women using a Delphi-AHP approach.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Development and psychometric evaluation of self-management scale for pregnant woman with gestational diabetes mellitus in China.Nursing open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo develop a self-management scale and evaluate its validity for pregnant woman with GDM in China.
designA cross-sectional survey design.
methodsThis study was conducted through three phases. The item pools of the scale were developed through literature review and expert interview. Content validity was assessed by an expert panel. Structure validity was evaluated through exploratory factor analysis. In the end, internal consistency reliability was tested.
resultsThe self-management scale includes four dimensions, including self-management consciousness, pregnancy management, blood glucose management and resource utilization, with a total of 35 items. In the scale, the Cronbach's α was 0.95. The split-half reliability of the overall scale is 0.79. And the test-retest reliability was 0.91. The content validity was 0.94.
conclusionsThe scale is significantly valid and reliable, and it can be used to evaluate the self-management ability of pregnant woman with GDM in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.