Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35224868›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2022

Pressure ulcer prevalence and prevention interventions - A ten-year nationwide survey in Sweden.

Ulrika Källman, Ami Hommel, Madeleine Borgstedt Risberg, Lena Gunningberg, Eva Sving, Carina Bååth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pressure ulcer practice in European hospitals: a scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Negative pressure wound therapy for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ulrika KällmanSödra Älvsborg Hospital, Borås and Head Office, Departure of patient safety, Region Västra Götaland, Borås, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2975-6827
Ami HommelDepartment of Care Science Malmö University, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6114-6535
Madeleine Borgstedt RisbergUnit for Public Health and Statistics, Region Östergötland, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Lena GunningbergDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0026-0414
Eva SvingDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0642-1159
Carina BååthDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9608-336X
Uppsala University · SELinköping University · SEMalmö University · SEØstfold University College · NORegion Västra Götaland · SE

Funding

Södra Älvsborgs Hospital, Malmö University, Region Östergötland, Uppsala University, Region Gävleborg, and Karlstad University Sweden & Östfold University College, NorwaySparbanken Sjuhärads foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe pressure ulcer prevalence and prevention interventions in hospital care in Sweden based on nationwide surveys conducted over a 10-year period. All Swedish hospitals were invited to participate in annual pressure ulcer prevalence surveys during the period 2011-2020. The data collection protocols included gender, age, skin assessment, risk assessment, and preventive interventions. In total, more than 130,000 patients were included in the ten prevalence surveys. The prevalence of pressure ulcers in Swedish hospital patients decreased significantly from 17.0 %to 11.4% between 2011 and 2020 and hospital-acquired pressure ulcers decreased from 8.1% to 6.4% between 2018 and 2020. There was no significant decline in medicaldevice-related pressure ulcers during the same period. The proportion of patients who were risk and skin assessed increased, as did the use of pressure-reducing mattresses, sliding sheets, heel protection, and nrepositioning plans. This study shows that the implementation of a national patient safety program has had an impact on the nationwide prevalence of pressure ulcers in hospital care and the occurrence of prevention strategies. However, one in ten patients in Swedish hospitals still suffers from pressure ulcers. Further improvements can be made.

Indexed as

Pressure UlcerHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsSkin CareSwedenhospitalpoint prevalencepressure ulcerpreventionSweden

Identifiers

PMID35224868
PMCPMC9615283
OpenAlexW4214633041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.