Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35224778›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral implants research2022

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation comparing bovine versus porcine bone xenografts mixed with autogenous bone graft. A split-mouth randomized controlled trial.

Pablo Galindo-Moreno, Dario Abril-García, Ana Belen Carrillo-Galvez, Federico Zurita, Natividad Martín-Morales, Francisco O'Valle, Miguel Padial-Molina

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral implants research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03797963 nacompletednot on this map

Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Study on the Use of Symbios Xenograft for Sinus Floor Elevation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de GranadaRan2019 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsSinus Floor AugmentationArmsPBM+ACB, ABB+ACB
NCT06156488 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Transcriptome Analysis of Human Bone Regeneration After Using an Anorganic Bovine Bone Graft With or Without a Combination of Polynucleotides and Hyaluronic Acid

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de GranadaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled5ConditionsSinus Floor AugmentationArmsMaxillary sinus floor augmentation
NCT07182929 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Radiographic Assessment of Deproteinized Porcine Versus Bovine Bone Mineral in Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorGuoli YangRan2024 to 2025Enrolled56ConditionsSinus Floor Elevation, Sinus Floor AugmentationArmsLateral Sinus Floor Augmentation with Deproteinized Porcine Bone Mineral
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bone Grafts: Everything You Need to Know.Journal of periodontal research · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. APCs in sinus floor augmentation.Periodontology 2000 · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pablo Galindo-MorenoDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-6470
Dario Abril-GarcíaDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Ana Belen Carrillo-GalvezDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Federico ZuritaDepartment of Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Natividad Martín-MoralesDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-1085
Francisco O'ValleDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-2287
Miguel Padial-MolinaDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6222-1341
Universidad de Granada · ES

Funding

Dentsply Sirona Implants I-BI-17-026Junta de Andalucía CTS-1028Junta de Andalucía CTS-138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare the effectiveness of two xenografts for maxillary sinus floor augmentation in terms of clinical, radiographical, histologic, and molecular outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsA split-mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted at the University of Granada. Ten consecutive patients in need of bilateral two-staged maxillary sinus floor augmentation were included. Each patient received both biomaterials (porcine bone mineral and anorganic bovine bone), which were randomly assigned for bilateral sinus augmentation. The maxillary autogenous bone scraped from the sinus access window was mixed with each xenograft at a 20:80 ratio. After a healing period of 6 months, bone biopsies were collected with a trephine during the implant placement in the regenerated area. Histologic, histomorphometrical, immunohistochemical, and molecular outcomes were analyzed. Clinical and radiographical data throughout the treatment phases were also evaluated.

resultsThe resulting anatomic features were similar between both groups. After six months of graft consolidation, the graft resorption rates were similar between both biomaterials. The histologic, histomorphometrical, and immunohistochemical results showed no statistical differences between groups.

conclusionAnorganic bovine bone and porcine bone mineral combined with maxillary autogenous cortical bone show similar biologic and radiologic features in terms of biomaterial resorption, osteoconduction, and osteogenesis when used for maxillary sinus floor augmentation.

Indexed as

Bone SubstitutesSinus Floor AugmentationAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone TransplantationCattleDental Implantation, EndosseousHeterograftsHumansMaxillary SinusMineralsMouthSwineBiocompatible MaterialsBone SubstitutesMineralsanorganic bovine bonebone biomaterialimplant dentistrymaxillary sinus augmentationporcine bone mineral

Identifiers

PMID35224778
PMCPMC9313845
OpenAlexW4214487250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.