Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35224736›Full record

ArticleAustralian veterinary journal2022

The innate immune stimulant Amplimune® is safe to administer to young feedlot cattle.

A L Alexander, E Doyle, A B Ingham, I Colditz, G McRae, S Alkemade, M P Cervantes, B C Hine

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian veterinary journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Contributions of large and agricultural animal models to immunology.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2025
    Review
  2. InactivatedFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A L AlexanderThe University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2350, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1238-6783
E DoyleThe University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2350, Australia.
A B InghamCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, Queensland, 4067, Australia.
I ColditzCSIRO Agriculture and Food, F.D. McMaster Laboratory, New England Hwy, Armidale, New South Wales, 2350, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9497-5148
G McRaeNovaVive Inc., 15 Dairy Avenue, Napanee, Ontario, K7R 1M4, Canada.
S AlkemadeNovaVive Inc., 15 Dairy Avenue, Napanee, Ontario, K7R 1M4, Canada.
M P CervantesNovaVive Inc., 15 Dairy Avenue, Napanee, Ontario, K7R 1M4, Canada.
B C HineCSIRO Agriculture and Food, F.D. McMaster Laboratory, New England Hwy, Armidale, New South Wales, 2350, Australia.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUNova Chemicals (Canada) · CAUniversity of New England · AU

Funding

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationIan McMaster Bequest scholarshipMeat and Livestock Australia B.FLT.3007QTAC Rural & Regional Enterprise scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfectious disease has a significant impact on livestock production. Availability of alternatives to antibiotics to prevent and treat disease is required to reduce reliance on antibiotics while not impacting animal welfare. Innate immune stimulants, such as mycobacterium cell wall fractions (MCWF), are used as alternatives to antibiotics for the treatment and prevention of infectious disease in a number of species including cattle, horses and dogs. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of Amplimune®, an MCWF-based immune stimulant, for weaner Angus cattle.

methodsOn day -1 and 0, sixty mixed-sex Angus weaner cattle were transported for 6 h before being inducted and housed in a large single pen, simulating feedlot induction conditions. The cattle were assigned to one of six treatment groups (n = 10 per group): 2 mL Amplimune intramuscularly (2IM); 2 mL Amplimune subcutaneously (2SC); 5 mL Amplimune intramuscularly (5IM); 5 mL Amplimune subcutaneously (5SC); 5 mL saline intramuscularly (SalIM) and 5 mL saline subcutaneously (SalSC) on day 0 following transportation. Body temperature, body weight, concentrations of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-12) and haematology parameters were measured at various times up to 96 h post-treatment.

resultsNo adverse effects from Amplimune treatment were observed. Amplimune induced an increase in circulating cytokine TNFα concentrations, total white blood cell count and lymphocyte counts indicative of activation of the innate immune system without causing an excessive inflammatory response.

conclusionsResults confirm that Amplimune can be safely administered to beef cattle at the dose rates and via the routes of administration investigated here.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesDog DiseasesHorse DiseasesMycobacteriumAnimalsAnimal WelfareAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleDogsHorsesImmunity, InnateTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAnti-Bacterial AgentsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAmplimunecattlerespiratory diseasetrained immunity

Identifiers

PMID35224736
PMCPMC9306767
OpenAlexW4214629148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.