Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35224673›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Comparison of four correction techniques for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Sebastien Pesenti, Jean-Luc Clément, Brice Ilharreborde, Christian Morin, Yann Philippe Charles, Henri François Parent, Philippe Violas, Marc Szadkowski, Louis Boissière, Jean-Luc Jouve and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Posterior spinal fusion using dual rod translation: impact on kyphosis restoration in AIS.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Rod angulation does not reflect sagittal curvature in adult spinal deformity surgery: comparison of lumbar lordosis and rod contouring.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sebastien PesentiPediatric Orthopedics, CHU Timone, Aix MArseille University, Marseille, France. seb.pesenti@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2230-2811
Jean-Luc ClémentDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics and Scoliosis Surgery, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice Chu Lenval, 57 Avenue de la Californie, 06200, Nice, France.
Brice IlharrebordeDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, CHU Robert Debré, AP-HP, University of Paris, 48 Bd Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France.
Christian MorinDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Institut Calot, rue du Dr Calot, 62600, Berck sur mer, France.
Yann Philippe CharlesDepartment of Spine Surgery, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle (FMTS), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, 1 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
Henri François ParentSpine Center, 6 rue de Belliniere, 49800, Trelaze, France.
Philippe ViolasDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes, 16 Boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200, Rennes, France.
Marc SzadkowskiSanty Orthopedic Center, 24 avenue Paul Santy, 69008, Lyon, France.
Louis BoissièreDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Unit, CHU Bordeaux Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Jean-Luc JouvePediatric Orthopedics, CHU Timone, Aix MArseille University, Marseille, France.
Federico SollaDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics and Scoliosis Surgery, Hôpitaux Pédiatriques de Nice Chu Lenval, 57 Avenue de la Californie, 06200, Nice, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhen performing posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), it is of major importance to address both coronal and sagittal deformities. Although several techniques have been described, few data exist comparing them. Our objective was to compare four techniques (in situ bending (ISB), rod derotation (RD), cantilever (C) and posteromedial translation (PMT)) for the correction of spinal deformity in AIS including thoracic deformity. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective study including 562 AIS patients with thoracic deformity with at least 24-month follow-up. Radiographic analysis was performed preoperatively, postoperatively and at last follow-up. The main outcomes were main curve correction and thoracic kyphosis restoration (TK).

resultsCoronal correction rate was significantly different among the four treatment groups (ISB 64% vs C 57% vs RD 55% vs PMT 67%, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression revealed that correction technique did not influence correction rate, whereas implant density, convex side compression and use of derotation connectors did. TK increase was significantly higher in the PMT group (average + 13°) than in DR (+ 3°), while ISB (-3°) and cantilever (-13°) resulted in TK decrease (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that TK increase was only influenced by the reduction technique (p < 0.001) and preoperative TK (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The four techniques had the same ability to correct spinal deformity in the coronal plane. Three factors were identified to improve correction rate: implant density, convex compression and use of derotation connectors. On the other hand, PMT was more effective in restoring TK, particularly in hypokyphotic patients.

Indexed as

KyphosisPedicle ScrewsScoliosisSpinal FusionAdolescentHumansRetrospective StudiesThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeAdolescent idiopathic surgeryReduction techniqueSurgeryThoracic kyphosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.